From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jw@raven.inka.de>
Received: from mail.inka.de (mail.inka.de
 [IPv6:2a04:c9c7:0:1073:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4EB387086F
 for <newlib@sourceware.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:40:07 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2B4EB387086F
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=raven.inka.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jw@raven.inka.de
Received: from raven.inka.de (uucp@[127.0.0.1])
 by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) 
 id 1jlWQH-0033SB-QV; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:40:05 +0200
Received: by raven.inka.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 90DCF600B2; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:36:16 +0200
From: Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de>
To: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: undefined references since newlib-3.2.0
Message-ID: <20200617113616.GH15174@raven.inka.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de>, newlib@sourceware.org
References: <87pna2hog9.fsf@keithp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87pna2hog9.fsf@keithp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3488.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_LINKBAIT, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Newlib mailing list <newlib.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/newlib>,
 <mailto:newlib-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/>
List-Post: <mailto:newlib@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newlib-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/newlib>,
 <mailto:newlib-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:40:08 -0000

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:20:54AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>         strtod
>         strtof
>         strtold
>         wcstod

While we're at it: the signatures for those functions descard the "const"
qualifier from their first parameter by returning a non-qualified pointer to
it.

This also applies to strtol, strtoul and friends.

Is this required by the standard? Or am I missing smoething important?

-- 
Josef Wolf
jw@raven.inka.de