From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM with only 32-bit floats do not have fast 64-bit FMA
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:06:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810190636.GE53219@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200808223413.4015633-1-keithp@keithp.com>
On Aug 8 15:34, Keith Packard via Newlib wrote:
> I added some new test configurations to my CI system for picolibc and
> discovered that when the new math code was built on 32-bit ARM
> processors with only single-precision floating hardware, several math
> functions were returning imprecise results. I got the expected results
> on processors with no FPU and on processors with both 32- and 64- bit
> FPUs.
>
> I discovered that the affected functions were using the 'fma' function
> on this hardware, even though (lacking 64-bit HW support), that
> function was being emulated without the required precision.
>
> This all boiled down to math_config.h incorrectly detecting 64-bit FMA
> support on ARM processors.
>
> This patch series contains three changes:
>
> 1. fix the fast FMA process so that 32-bit ARM processors without 64-bit FMA
> support don't use 'fma' for the new math functions
>
> 2. Add detection of fast FMAF, which 32-bit ARM processors with only
> 32-bit FPUs *do* support.
>
> 3. Add ARM versions of fma and fmaf which are used when those
> instructions are available.
>
Pushed. I just regen'ed newlib/libm/machine/arm/Makefile.in.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-08 22:34 Keith Packard
2020-08-08 22:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] libm: ARM without HW double does not have fast FMA Keith Packard
2020-08-08 22:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] libm: Detect fast fmaf support Keith Packard
2020-08-08 22:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] libm/machine/arm: Add optimized fmaf and fma when available Keith Packard
2020-08-10 9:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARM with only 32-bit floats do not have fast 64-bit FMA Corinna Vinschen
2020-08-10 14:43 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-08-10 15:19 ` Keith Packard
2020-08-10 19:06 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2020-09-01 16:32 ` Sebastian Huber
2020-09-01 17:21 ` Sebastian Huber
2020-09-01 18:04 ` Sebastian Huber
2020-09-01 19:28 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-01 21:16 ` Joseph Myers
2020-09-01 23:06 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-02 4:41 ` Sebastian Huber
2020-09-02 5:25 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-02 5:35 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-02 17:12 ` Joseph Myers
2020-09-02 17:59 ` Sebastian Huber
2020-09-02 20:39 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-01 19:50 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-07 14:09 Eric Bresie
2020-09-07 17:16 ` Keith Packard
2020-09-07 20:16 ` Brian Inglis
2020-09-07 22:23 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810190636.GE53219@calimero.vinschen.de \
--to=vinschen@redhat.com \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).