From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout02.t-online.de (mailout02.t-online.de [194.25.134.17]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB5C3858D35 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 11:52:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7EB5C3858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=t-online.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=t-online.de Received: from fwd76.dcpf.telekom.de (fwd76.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.102]) by mailout02.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B47217476 for ; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 13:52:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.26] ([87.154.44.34]) by fwd76.t-online.de with (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1qDOI3-0c9wnY0; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 13:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4cf65a8e-8f36-1891-e988-eadac34fa979@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 13:52:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: Newlib build fails Content-Language: de-DE To: newlib@sourceware.org References: <054401d9a62e$7f6da9a0$7e48fce0$@tranaptic.ca> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= In-Reply-To: <054401d9a62e$7f6da9a0$7e48fce0$@tranaptic.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1687693943-477FF5E3-59938311/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: f19dadba-f395-4441-8b05-3574e5a32b6b X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Am 24.06.2023 um 01:57 schrieb Keith Clifford: > Hi, > > I am building newlib for a MinGW cross compiler tool chain for ARM, M68K, > and PowerPC. But why are you building it as a "canadian cross"? In other words, why would you use Cygwin to build this cross compiler, instead of MinGW itself?