From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68024 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2017 22:03:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact newlib-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: newlib-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 68015 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2017 22:03:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*x:ZimbraWebClient, H*UA:ZimbraWebClient, H*M:zimbra, forthcoming X-HELO: mx3-phx2.redhat.com Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (HELO mx3-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 22:03:42 +0000 Received: from zmail20.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail20.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.23]) by mx3-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v16M3cPs007187; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:03:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 22:03:00 -0000 From: Jeff Johnston To: Freddie Chopin Cc: newlib@sourceware.org Message-ID: <627055789.24038169.1486418618145.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1486378135.1276.13.camel@op.pl> References: <1485802576.1386.6.camel@op.pl> <1485802641.1386.7.camel@op.pl> <1486378135.1276.13.camel@op.pl> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Unify names of all lock objects MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 I have applied the lock renaming patch. I still see _lock vs __lock being used for external names. I assume there is another patch forth-coming. -- Jeff J. ----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 19:57 +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > Most recent patch from Thomas' that adds lock retargeting, with > > changed > > names of objects to work on top of my patch. > > Hello group! > > Any chance of merging this (and other 2 patches from Thomas)? (; > > Thanks in advance! > FCh >