From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113175 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2017 10:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact newlib-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: newlib-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 112791 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jan 2017 10:30:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:1485802, H*f:sk:1485802, H*MI:sk:1485802 X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:30:21 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339361595; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 02:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.206.52] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA5603F477 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 02:30:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Unify names of all lock objects To: newlib@sourceware.org References: <1485802576.1386.6.camel@op.pl> <1485802641.1386.7.camel@op.pl> From: Thomas Preudhomme Message-ID: <9b5b3304-5d1c-8244-5756-d3c2abf8ba1c@foss.arm.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1485802641.1386.7.camel@op.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 Hi, On 30/01/17 18:57, Freddie Chopin wrote: > Most recent patch from Thomas' that adds lock retargeting, with changed > names of objects to work on top of my patch. Thanks Freddie but please note that I've got an updated version addressing comments I've received. It's also based on yet another patch that make sure all static locks are guarded with !defined(__SINGLE_THREAD__). I've already rebased them and will send them shortly. Best regards, Thomas