From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sword.l.dragon@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60093386100B
 for <newlib@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:14:52 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 60093386100B
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id a13so3908554vso.12
 for <newlib@sourceware.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=oAxXxgqOFgLWme+wbAefu9u3NeZDWrZqjNB4cT8oNdI=;
 b=jOO25GRhjosL4bws1iPMp2mbueuqAQkBDCMbi+1bnhSCrgWpTI8PjOJ2OleE3y5zUU
 BGyE+vPby66LPga6tbzZroWmoyNG25iGLZVbOgxGfmuwieUtdW/k64i3LggBJL9M1GWF
 eCTyb0+EcJgl0RNzz4Pomr5idhRnq0wUVqfTOnyA2MOLx32L7HI5WaLacsPqUVAzs2Zc
 BTUJSP81/EWMtcaQwUlTg57Tl/8Tk+asB23Hnm7fT1B7f6FJJW7Z/p9cPTSkZJ9/qOi0
 bTRnAJBdz6d674pDBpG4/bsZgn7qufXYJb/URKY+KtC/WLMMDQD4q8qYLB44i9KuzfOQ
 K40A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/UV2vv4C4mQQfZcg+QZ4qOKylqlGNTfIgznQ+1vzr88MnVHsD
 ITvJKVyyIBcmoQHuRG1Dur144SQs+7Abfx44ham7f3is8+Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7A5sT3E1s0c6dYyJBJ4VhOlx8MQWkRDYfl/rOxuy08BFfHkIPq2N2Zu5kWPgRlSAFQF0XIyqRYBCl4mLpRBU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:8ec7:: with SMTP id q190mr1629701vsd.75.1598253291433; 
 Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yingchun Li <sword.l.dragon@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:14:40 +0800
Message-ID: <CADkvYHG7_nbdR23Smm8JrBtCT2a=sMhhZ0FPN60y3Y-OMyMOgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Why the cplusplus doesn't support -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
To: newlib@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Newlib mailing list <newlib.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/newlib>,
 <mailto:newlib-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/>
List-Post: <mailto:newlib@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newlib-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/newlib>,
 <mailto:newlib-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:14:53 -0000

Sorry, My previous post
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2020/017909.html
shows the  wrong format, sorry for that.
Now post it again.

In the sys/features.h, the "__SSP_FORTIFY_LEVEL" will not be defined when
the source file is cplusplus.
#if _FORTIFY_SOURCE > 0 && !defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(__lint__)
&& \   (__OPTIMIZE__ > 0 || defined(__clang__)) && __GNUC_PREREQ__(4,
1)
#  if _FORTIFY_SOURCE > 1
#    define __SSP_FORTIFY_LEVEL 2#  else#    define __SSP_FORTIFY_LEVEL 1
#  endif
#else
#  define __SSP_FORTIFY_LEVEL 0
#endif
So, if defined cplusplus, the __SPP_FORTIFY_LEVEL is always 0.My question is why
disable this feature,  if enable this feature forcely, is there any
possible issue?

Br,Yingchun