I am attaching the patch for inttypes methods after modification. I am
requesting you to please review the same.

Regards,
Aditya

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Jul 19 10:13, Craig Howland wrote:
>> On 07/19/2017 08:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > What you really want is to define a static function which takes the
>> > reent pointer and strtoimax_l/strtoimax only calling that, like this:
>> >
>> > --- snip ---
>> > static intmax_t
>> > _strtoimax_r(struct _reent *rptr, const char * __restrict nptr,
>> >          char ** __restrict endptr, int base, locale_t loc)
>> Corinna:
>>      Why static?  In general, the reentrant forms are included in the header
>> files so that they can be called directly if an application so desires.
>
> Good point.  Yes, the function should better be non-static and added
> to inttypes.h as well (unconditionally).
>
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat