From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5E393858D3C for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 21:57:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E5E393858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1661205457; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uRF/dKqykjKvVaYd+7EUnH8ZaKQCPA7EqW7y1kTFHZo=; b=gSi9yrkTMOJWLWFNjtfyMF9zQy8LFecnlk23AWL4fJszwCieWV0BW6Aj3/BY9ej1DSKeM1 MawX7Wpk3vfb/dDjQswCwTmbmERbaUWxNpyr53UvRIdva8ZVEiei/Of1mcixQlgsUFyMbS FgSBtK9nmXlHHZ6tvI/7bHsOpkUgWdM= Received: from mail-yw1-f199.google.com (mail-yw1-f199.google.com [209.85.128.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-107-3MA5BYuEOkWztNzXYQnQiA-1; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:57:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3MA5BYuEOkWztNzXYQnQiA-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-33352499223so207787057b3.8 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:57:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=uRF/dKqykjKvVaYd+7EUnH8ZaKQCPA7EqW7y1kTFHZo=; b=Amt6YdJVQf4PxJ/A5YvGTGXvBO51NZhj/hSrlEGrWCpOvyJy6eyB3lDsTPSP5q5lOZ 1X4WrO8XpK/jmHAyRHWogOSDR+Q8MPSGsTvn5lSennZelCvPBdKOflHooBurOtQ9SG0x CrBl12MzejceoDCj2jFfUVj7M/r1UAy+yP52osmH8SQooT+b4TrvtaLk8v/tXlRBENLD Z9glTBRZGcX31gXBut8ifHvNjQsZ/X53DiMn8TpOWNXYvsP8bEmQXHhcsbBJr2I7rMil OOIXCGnZeDqzkHaW12xe2a1xN9t0e8HLRmEEu95q8d0mk/srg/34Xi/EwlxmtcPXxjPO Qm/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1WYp5FT4iLoERoAoocpPRZLEDNa27yCtckIEtoOUV4AYxDaZrh g4eJJiTa6O5EDXhY9JvOa4IvSA6MiOUSBSwU+EGAH2bxCbQO0aZTaO9h3XUg1v8fHC8Fs/BE2LM YHJymQ/Pvp6l2X4JckOIkyZ0GebOgxvk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:c685:0:b0:692:a21b:bd54 with SMTP id k127-20020a25c685000000b00692a21bbd54mr21114915ybf.262.1661205455380; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:57:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR757ul00lymEi5dXy9x25KxpYm1T/d9DoNpCZ6RsB8tHseF/D6YMMCAJ/70G+mGL7Glt6jrr0tHPSRMvmO9YsM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:c685:0:b0:692:a21b:bd54 with SMTP id k127-20020a25c685000000b00692a21bbd54mr21114907ybf.262.1661205455116; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:57:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jeff Johnston Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:57:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: _newlib_version.h not filled with data To: Mara Sophie Grosch Cc: Newlib X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 21:57:44 -0000 Hi Mara, I have pushed a fix for this. Not sure why the _newlib_version.hin file was changed as such, but I put it back to how it was done in earlier versions and added the needed AC_DEFINE statements back into configure.ac. I tested and it is working again. -- Jeff J. On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 2:45 PM Mara Sophie Grosch wrote: > Hi, > > looks like current master is broken, not filling the macros in > _newlib_version.h with data - it stays unprocessed. > > Just stumbled over this while building for my hobby OS target, but > someone else stumbled over this, too [1]. > > Sadly no idea how to fix this :/ > > Best, Mara > > [1] > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73444689/macros-defined-in-newlib-version-h-are-not-filled-with-actual-value > >