From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1137A3858415 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:32:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1137A3858415 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643992326; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oS587RzApIaQ9/SrlWic0fhY/f6voOLbPHSVSuKFYy8=; b=dom82wo5acNVzywnqUJ6CZojeKzBIgv04O7ynK26UCn9G30m2+9gWkRWWyBZSo8I51/c3w skhcY3ZmE4QpFZSpZ8wAzc0wJWLhOXvj5UgTJfQtL4DCQERtcaR9IRWK5+zJnx2JYo6r+R Y3P3aHaJYAl7zcBUVaueDDBuASESLWE= Received: from mail-yb1-f200.google.com (mail-yb1-f200.google.com [209.85.219.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-569-qIuls98JMnOUTw_vErETwg-1; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 11:32:05 -0500 X-MC-Unique: qIuls98JMnOUTw_vErETwg-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f200.google.com with SMTP id x1-20020a25a001000000b0061c64ee0196so4416727ybh.9 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 08:32:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=oS587RzApIaQ9/SrlWic0fhY/f6voOLbPHSVSuKFYy8=; b=2xHYFlTYshvroW2LMBJd8JqETe5PCwonGsIfKhJ42LyYgUzkZANDpUDG/aXDAr5lrg nZEVHSBFbF2Zci/axc/7Lw5laFsHiE7SViLyDOC7ODLikdpk7LGBxBmYGsS78jFX3+H0 bC7hfdeeuFT2qrvBXag/weoiDVA2NGl0CkkXIH2VF/gQc7fkULe4FYZxoGzriwskgVjf WMbQyT4HJiNXMaEbCeh0U0T7CX9oiaR8KsWasXNpmLJAq4LYh7I2jr3RzcB7ctals0n/ d0S6z2uT9sTeYiNRGRSH6R/dlooehNGxm6Bh/GGR+FdGoEENMyU0/t6wz5qs8Qzajj2e kTNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ahxIvdp4uXjtnGC2+shh8QI+9ZDeVzkLOCAscOgfYIrlWyJqm ySaYeN27RJWJ7qeBxp3JPLJtKVoYUL/nBtc+K7CsG3GzORJ18bciHtSi5KE39yOsGZeC8sVtkQc NLtlT5qIEvJ8FY5er5HgBSD17CiaDnyU= X-Received: by 2002:a25:148b:: with SMTP id 133mr3554491ybu.270.1643992324874; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 08:32:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7GebhwMsyFN8DfxlR5RTopUzWw0ZgOe+1ZIxmbH9cg3/n33iCIDChHQpjeKV+hpPSaLygW5sZryA6tEwOR0g= X-Received: by 2002:a25:148b:: with SMTP id 133mr3554476ybu.270.1643992324662; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 08:32:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jeff Johnston Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:31:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 4.2.0 To: Newlib , Jeff Johnston Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jjohnstn@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 16:32:08 -0000 Fine by me. On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 4:23 AM Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 3 20:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 03 Feb 2022 12:50, Jeff Johnston wrote: > > > That was the official yearly snapshot. Newlib was bumped to 4.2.0 as > there > > > were configuration changes. > > > I imagine that another snapshot is warranted soon with all the other > > > various configuration changes being made recently. > > > > i would have leaned the other direction ... give them longer to bake by > devs > > building the latest git before kicking out a "release" that other people > might > > expect to be pretty stable. > > -mike > > I agree with Mike here. A blatant bug might warrant a new release, > autotool changes... not so much. Better we let them simmer and be > worked on so they stabilize until the next EOY release. > > > Corinna > >