From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836AF383F859 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:31:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 836AF383F859 Received: from mail-pf1-f197.google.com (mail-pf1-f197.google.com [209.85.210.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-226-fJgiz0qLOfm9fPsXM8kijQ-1; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:30:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fJgiz0qLOfm9fPsXM8kijQ-1 Received: by mail-pf1-f197.google.com with SMTP id i7so5047466pfk.3 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=OVJd/iN1oIknGWJAT7oxgWCVKLzysruAwXWEWM3TiCQ=; b=islTKjMGIJZEXlsEhKAFo5yCYToDqC6/IPkmEB2KyJf4hN2MDmWtWtHxBIDshR7rQ+ asj1B8OtM2A8h8E0O7RxliA1YBFDlfvHGTnhYnhmltcbP3IVxZFLtM0yF70HF0QOTA/K 0sThzplDajy6CaNJvTcEOzvEgTIh++yv5GwzWWgM4SebFlnY1QZJwa3gksS6uLaZZrO2 Inzdsb5AGpd66GpcFZbSst8YDxEP+T6DP6j3E2+GX6FLan+Jv+dEmY81vcvsxXt+fh2g 6m2gYvSGEnrM9xsD35QYa+lFqXLt+AcZCPVKQh9wCBVN+o0zm6kQcYzSGOVBzAV2Ap0o DDBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kTFiBttCByqZdXiQ9SnJ1sDLHgs1mIk2Eum4uX4iHRqTYCIQv 6IIxHgT2O4SkO6R+RK861tphvvssmo49/AgR/UC7r6nkrAs6I2JGmNUbcfVDdWDkoB85Wm1X3HN uazwFfiK+BoySvB8Rq/NtMD6Rb6Gh5Vw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ab8d:: with SMTP id f13mr8296984plr.58.1591896652715; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:30:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJJ32SqbVK5sOYSS/ZHgr5ufA1TU16nNOe6MTdsRPKuiknfBgMn7w3QEk3SRzxU/qL8peeMbi2VjNrrSDr3Rg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ab8d:: with SMTP id f13mr8296968plr.58.1591896652508; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:30:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200611093106.GC15174@raven.inka.de> In-Reply-To: <20200611093106.GC15174@raven.inka.de> From: Jeff Johnston Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:30:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Confusion about version numbering scheme To: Josef Wolf , Newlib X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:31:10 -0000 Hi Josef, The newlib tag gets created by a shell script I run which at the same time creates the archive and uploads it. I can't speak as to why the cygwin tags are the way they are and Corinna is on vacation at the moment, but perhaps one of the other Cygwin maintainers can comment. -- Jeff J. On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:40 AM Josef Wolf wrote: > Hello all, > > in order to find out details for > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/newlib/2020/017688.html > I decided to git-bisect newlib-3.1.0 up to newlib-3.2.0. > > And on that, I'm somewhat confused about newlib version numbering scheme. > > How comes that cygwin-3_0-branch and cygwin-3_0_x-release are SUCCESSORS of > newlib-3.1.0 tag? > > Thbis makes me wonder whether > ftp://sourceware.org/pub/newlib/newlib-3.1.0.tar.gz was really created > from > the newlib-3.1.0 tag? > > -- > Josef Wolf > jw@raven.inka.de > >