From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Cc: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Fix fr30 libgloss build
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:54:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOox84vE4Nre_o5rGad3-i3PGAE4m0sKrKDZSnLuXvEsGSuB+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7598c8ae-b123-4c47-8157-0ec11d78749c@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1508 bytes --]
Looks fine. Feel free to push.
-- Jeff J.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 9:47 AM Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> gcc-14 will default to c99 and as a result a fair amount of old code in
> newlib (particularly libgloss) is failing to build. I don't offhand
> know how many patches will be necessary to fix the various failures.
> I'll just pick them off one by one from my tree.
>
> This particular patch works around the return-mismatch problem
> syscalls.c for fr30.
>
> That file is a bit odd in that most functions are declared as returning
> an integer, but the implementations look like:
>
> > int
> > _read (file, ptr, len)
> > int file;
> > char * ptr;
> > int len;
> > {
> > asm ("ldi:8 %0, r0" :: "i" (SYS_read) : "r0");
> > asm ("int #10");
> >
> > return;
> > }
>
>
> Note the lack of a value on the "return" statement. The assumption is
> that the interrupt handler implementing syscalls will put the return
> value into the proper register, so falling off the end of the C function
> or returning with no value works in the expected way. It's not good
> code, but it probably works.
>
> Working from that assumption I decided to just use a pragma to disable
> the upgraded diagnostic from GCC -- essentially preserving existing
> behavior.
>
> This is the only fr30 specific issue that needs to be resolved and the
> only issue (so far) I've seen of this specific nature.
>
> OK for the trunk?
>
> jeff
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 14:46 Jeff Law
2023-12-14 15:54 ` Jeff Johnston [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOox84vE4Nre_o5rGad3-i3PGAE4m0sKrKDZSnLuXvEsGSuB+Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).