From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D8D385840E for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:34:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 08D8D385840E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 559) id 8FC38342F4B; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:34:11 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger To: newlib@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] change _COMPILING_NEWLIB to _LIBC Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: newlib@sourceware.org References: <20211109032414.15448-1-vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s+CDYoGh/n4nQdDA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:34:10 -0000 --s+CDYoGh/n4nQdDA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11 Nov 2021 11:37, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 8 22:24, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Use the same name as glibc & gnulib to indicate "newlib itself is > > being compiled". This also harmonizes the codebase a bit in that > > _LIBC was already used in places instead of _COMPILING_NEWLIB. > >=20 > > Building for bfin-elf, mips-elf, and x86_64-pc-cygwin produces > > the same object code. >=20 > Can you please rebase your patch to the latest master? It doesn't > apply for testing. it depends on "define _COMPILING_NEWLIB for all targets when compiling" which is still (maybe?) waiting on approval -mike --s+CDYoGh/n4nQdDA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmGNmmMACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YFvfg//USTNbjcOgCTe3rXbLVE1kyPnNeBty4BcdGBH0uqmZfxWz7VbSe9PjuKD THs+mautlEYXCnKvUIbhgfah5keIXOogp5vfLN/VF0y5nhfKv13J0+1XfyFRY3UN r6mW7vuUD+J1W0OpnPVy3YrdN5HHPDDjWYOHn2Ys5CO9qXyvWaOBySAhNuTmo3vl OCCXrZ0I250yXJQ87aDwLKgNY006qPurPk1nfoH6MV2bgi6+FN+xSKK7JzvwG3AZ 2jtKGPiWvZsqn2/mweofFyvocpzROeSq7QKxyYvnFdpkgDy/9w3XECl6Z9sfHIg1 8tG+zYCSZRjIRTsqv5aHc2Jy5rOY74FEqinlbiKDzkXPvU9I6tptRpjDlhZQNjvt eVXasgHaxcCsWvxv4g0gGElDa8ADkTR4QFt/M+O9UJiy8XGLU23gGz98A9zd/4T1 uy/EgaLWC3Y+/U5/DstQTrJ+vC/H0bsueWhVLIqkvs8f02gpICX/NEW1XYmvAX8Z HCwkcorAyLNQ2uVoqwFEe0zIRoRQIAyjbN4bgTna497kSkEu5j4zAoA6J3dMxmlu S6AiiGFA3WeWt6cVolXhBj+mYCyGXXJKNAfPWDEdkOcItTwD2kZ/s9jJtn6oPFPm AORNdUhFtyPGRFYPl2WCRIY83XOM31FeByNWlVeGhWC7tUe75Cw= =Y8aM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s+CDYoGh/n4nQdDA--