From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80B5385F033 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:17:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A80B5385F033 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1643638625; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=q/9j9NqwpAwWnQCzlnYITeI+436Bex0QJ7H28uBjQKI=; b=dmhdfb1uQ7g87MjRw2cZpgwWTwRe4wjo+qTpAuG73kFRfJp9T1q1fdUzH5siRHyZIDv/Ei aCZGAGBK8VtrrohO2IU8AV+4rcocfmCq5cDHlHiQzkNZRibfHIteTx4EYyn6E7ztA3fbQj AnkqKaJds6G5Y/kzmP3ttlyw06W7NEY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-590-YdyVV_mYPnKVChCwbkYTug-1; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:17:03 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YdyVV_mYPnKVChCwbkYTug-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E149981424D for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (ovpn-112-15.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.15]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B236078AB3 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2B7AAA80884; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:17:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:17:01 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: newlib@sourceware.org Subject: Re: newlib_cv_ vs libc_cv_ autoconf cache vars prefix Message-ID: Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: newlib@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=vinschen@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:17:06 -0000 On Jan 28 04:44, Mike Frysinger wrote: > the newlib/libgloss configure scripts use both libc_cv_ and newlib_cv_ as > their autoconf cache var prefixes. this really should be just one name. > i'm inclined to use newlib_cv_ rather than the more generic libc_cv_. any > preferences or reasons to pick one or the other ? > > libgloss also has cache vars. i'm inclined to have it use newlib_cv_ too > since, as a project, it's carved out the namespace, and doesn't really need > its own libgloss_cv_ prefix. > -mike AFAICS, only six libc_cv_* and two newlib_cv_* vars exist at all, and only two of the libc_cv_* vars are AC_SUBST'ed and show up in the Makefile. Using the same prefix for all vars, it would be the smaller change to switch the 2 newlib_cv's to libc_cv. The result would be the same. Corinna