From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A684385841F for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:11:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5A684385841F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix, from userid 559) id C7E53342EA6; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:11:49 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger To: Richard Earnshaw , newlib@sourceware.org, Brian Inglis Subject: Re: newlib not building (needs aclocal) Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Richard Earnshaw , newlib@sourceware.org, Brian Inglis References: <6e6ec1c8-70b3-5cc2-3b06-60f516a44ed0@foss.arm.com> <367ed8f2-e428-aacb-a4f9-82119d6408e4@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <5316b8e2-fd3e-0ad3-82f9-255cabd0ca1b@foss.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LI4lUF4yxt2rsMZi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:11:50 -0000 --LI4lUF4yxt2rsMZi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On 24 Feb 2022 02:07, Mike Frysinger wrote: > practically speaking, i don't think topic branches would help that much as > you highlight -- the newlib project, and number of projects/devs, is much > too small to get a good signal back. which isn't to say i'm against them. i asked in a previous thread a while back about newlib policies around creating branches like this so i could push my local state for people to peek at, but didn't get a response. so i assumed it was undesired or not allowed. at this point, i've got maybe 5 patches for libgloss (update toolchain settings as has been done in newlib already) & 5 for newlib (finish libc conversion to top-level like libm) before i call it quits. -mike --LI4lUF4yxt2rsMZi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmIXL7UACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YG4TQ/8C4vv2TMLPnzAcE8Hm40tWAMJIxsVk8NHbjWyUlNjU+y5VgpQs3kLjbQt MU7hda2GxTyr6BjbDsnzngH51JcfENEoZYZ4eZRTQmRRh2aM3oA++xLSd5giaVRn imG+nQl8KNBfO2+CWPPV7Rb6XW4rMUDWrspteDpMrOMLdmKxxin6bQAK8nKs2/EW 6d3fNXLpzveSeJ1BDCcQyXTQD4EgvhmjzZkpxnb4Yoi7kRA9PDaQtm199V4r6NRt 9kFCI5BTbRXnYaWz8VKVVXTYW0+mQnFtsFrLCo7yx2zosLD7mMhbgdiKvJRwX/ch Bh06qFK9poZ7/V4OL74OZ+ULSh9AADQ41oLyOca3vUBKjLuoTUNd/H/1O6F6kSnG cwXvLsO1a5TRl1XwDfzFyGWUVBrkDWDBjn+3+1VqB6LmlGiATESjL1tD/i1E/ZqD dYErmzlEUzN4dKAKA4hK3YIC3r343Ammz3+2quY5fiC/6nH34WIq1Ln17xTbLljw zSE/JohbdhSqms4qmnuWxgVWVAaX86ywA1y8uoW8XgL+8+1JKIG4NJJC/+Xu7/4V biGlpyLrfX+tN8SCytiT7sV+nlcO8q26DT3Ibc6UtfyZ4ZXBkkKa9alPr+JIv0MA /XqZcE4Awc4Jyi7ZII5ghyuKXm5yDKOk5zz88RmMeAay5sVSVfI= =b6lT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LI4lUF4yxt2rsMZi--