Re: [PATCH] libgloss: riscv: Convert to non-recursive automake

[Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>]

On Aug 23 16:12, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> PR 29515 points out our documentation builds are broken, let's just move
> over to the new non-recursive builds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> I think something as small as adding an empty "html" target could make that bug
> report go away, but when poking around I couldn't figure out why our
> Makefile.in was so different.  I ended up running into vapier's build system
> conversion patches and figured it would be easier to just throw away our
> current build configuration rather than trying to figure out how it works.
> 
> This builds for me and the resulting libraries look generally OK, but I don't
> personally use newlib right now so I don't have anything specific setup for
> testing.
> 
> I haven't included the generated files from running autoconf/automake as I'm
> getting a lot of diff right now due to some version mis-matches on my
> development box.  If folks like this then I'm happy to sort that out, just
> figured I'd send something along now to see if this is the right way to go --
> it's a lot of diff just to make "make html" work, but as far as I can tell the
> plan is to convert all subdirs over eventually so it seems sane to me.

Pushed with regenerated configurey.


Thanks,
Corinna