public inbox for newlib@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: newlib@sourceware.org, "Frager, Neal" <neal.frager@amd.com>,
	"jjohnstn@redhat.com" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>,
	"thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	"cjwfirmware@vxmdesign.com" <cjwfirmware@vxmdesign.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] configure.ac: configurable tooldir install path
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:21:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZ7EHebQivv37iBx@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZZ6xxqDlpbXBuqmQ@vapier>

On Jan 10 10:03, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2024 10:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Maybe we should switch newlib/cygwin to 2.71 as well, eventually?
> > 
> > We're in the process of preparing the next Cygwin release which should
> > be due end of this month.  After that I don't see any reason that we
> > can't bumb the configury to the latest autotools.
> 
> i'm not a fan of diverging from the rest of the source projects.  i want
> the rest of gcc/binutils/gdb move to autoconf-2.71 & automake-1.16, but
> i don't have the cycles to drive that.  i'm also not sure what their
> preference is when it comes to release timings.
> 	autoconf-2.69:   Apr 2012
> 	         2.70:   Dec 2020
> 	         2.71:   Jan 2021
> 	automake-1.15:   Dec 2014
> 	         1.15.1: Jun 2017
> 	         1.16:   Feb 2018
> 	         1.16.5: Oct 2021
> personally i think 2 years is enough for the dev population who actually
> work on these projects, but who knows.
> 
> gcc is currently on autoconf-2.69.  it enforces this:
> config/override.m4:
> 	dnl Ensure exactly this Autoconf version is used
> 	m4_ifndef([_GCC_AUTOCONF_VERSION],
> 	  [m4_define([_GCC_AUTOCONF_VERSION], [2.69])])
> 	dnl Test for the exact version when AC_INIT is expanded.

Right.  We shouldn't switch to 2.71 before gcc/binutils/gdb did.
I thought they already switched, sorry for not checking myself.


Thanks,
Corinna


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-10 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09 10:39 Neal Frager
2024-01-09 14:18 ` Frager, Neal
2024-01-09 15:35   ` Frager, Neal
2024-01-10  9:53   ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-01-10 15:03     ` Mike Frysinger
2024-01-10 16:21       ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2024-01-10 20:44         ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZZ7EHebQivv37iBx@calimero.vinschen.de \
    --to=vinschen@redhat.com \
    --cc=cjwfirmware@vxmdesign.com \
    --cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
    --cc=neal.frager@amd.com \
    --cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).