From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0C43858410 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:04:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2E0C43858410 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2E0C43858410 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705917876; cv=none; b=lBK8SAA44A91FG4k94FmexewCTMRQqZTFI0YyJ3OyqwZqlSkSeTpXr7902HmH62psEOIbYN3RzFQg+MuEHeQrXgMlo4pKR98P1r8lcn/S+JHhg+QvC+w2CrDdjaQsDc8GXxkUSkNvV5OQ8cCOMeZ6PaX39KufJv0SGAIc62B79A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705917876; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tZ+mswCF6GzNXv+Xl0lciHe8GYKKm4UU2PYlQ/vHByI=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=qpx3zfjJKdnd9V3+RXog/LOsQbd07LAg33ahFD0nmNZWi7noJwMqM2IcoQtfpVKlx1ve02xYokskDCCTw0DCSHn6G7pyB1+EA4oy/jdlNKGXvOGcyo5vXmJkVM8izWAITXC3MnDECdDTqqyf4KOVeqtRKqTOE9H1X4EzwnO++P8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705917872; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=XxDnlt1uI7z8g0RpkH3TjBQnKMj9ekDfMgEm6FQxqGo=; b=H4akQiDBaHjOvj2LcVtdMCJrqd+AKV8jmaoAM75XU14Pmib2T1xqj0twKvj16Xwq/IMay1 Vv72o6xc+9OWyD0HM0+EL7Nxv+3hMRNqz0d9mJzRRtWck0dVcY3ymr/pvE1RvPlXobQDki QLN3n4mHQW6xAdxXBYy4qOGIdI/bytc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-133-_3U55lH6MYC9X7LiHfx0iQ-1; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 05:04:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: _3U55lH6MYC9X7LiHfx0iQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C997C185A782; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (unknown [10.39.192.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A853B51D5; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2D550A806DE; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:04:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:04:29 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Dimitar Dimitrov , newlib@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] libgloss: pru: Trim crt0-minrt.o Message-ID: Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: Mike Frysinger , Dimitar Dimitrov , newlib@sourceware.org References: <20240104171952.1409897-1-dimitar@dinux.eu> <20240104171952.1409897-2-dimitar@dinux.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Jan 20 13:57, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 20 Jan 2024 17:15, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 08:46:36AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > should you be listed in newlib/MAINTAINERS for pru ? > > > > Yes, I would be honoured. > > > > I've been running and monitoring CI for the GNU toolchain for PRU, > > including newlib, for a few years. And I intend to continue doing so. > > send a patch for Corinna & Jeff to approve :) > > do you have push access to newlib now ? might be worth asking for that too > so you can be added to the "write privileges after getting approval" section. > -mike libgloss isn't my playfield, so I was deferring this to Jeff. Personally I have no problems with that. For the time being, I was trying to merge the patches but the first patch to the build system already fails to apply cleanly. ANy chance to regenerate it relative to current main? Thanks, Corinna