From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EFC3858434 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:13:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D1EFC3858434 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D1EFC3858434 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708683206; cv=none; b=BEFg9Z3h0VRcamnw94d7nzQwOLUJ/uGUrSWM7R9Qc0ib2eCLiArnVNiKDqickofZidrNriibooUTGVXah0qiG4amy9OnzZIKDltKZ61jIsAPlM3L98j1ncMfOJXT79zMlk/XEoN7yQuu8NiEghO7geFtObtq1t1RbAHyqy9cYUU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708683206; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o/C24sNtRPhdvjXQcN8B884YS7vn+uFZDQHdVu89Z2E=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=jyH43Kjjn4fPC7qOX6oFoeOFvDK1MCCSmzWA1uoweITu5EyHU1NvA42SRM4VuJxM3JSmmgeusnu31hamEMXNqpDCtYyr9tVQB3wecuI0ia2wKzpRZnhG3UudV6aBljYHI4NjueWABjXyYCvntI5u4B4mEBU4Twk9jEWjg5egjyA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708683204; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=+Wk3cHORHR/fe3wtWwDfCzkyBAYe7kl2cdWVsBDAVyk=; b=dvwdsHSPJLV3ecV1vlBTY4G6wuH8m12GhvWlqcQnMNOpy+tP5yh26+QykbVrTRs3qKfd6O rVkt6gl8LHsUbBt5v9NkjyduGp8Xdly6/7MfSYb67aZcqy2rsnpSp/UbhtCLN/SopZrJK0 MLi1IS+MGaejv/wAUck1rFYjaspcJJg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-488-hjgJM5rJNyGMZw32kF4-TQ-1; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:13:23 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hjgJM5rJNyGMZw32kF4-TQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0443B3806720 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (unknown [10.39.195.74]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D72664039DA1 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id B7152A80900; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:13:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:13:21 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: newlib@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTEMS: Define ssize_t for Message-ID: Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: newlib@sourceware.org References: <20240223054920.20618-1-sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20240223054920.20618-1-sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Feb 23 06:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: > This fixes the following build issue: > > newlib/libc/include/dirent.h:84:1: error: unknown type name 'ssize_t'; did you mean '_ssize_t'? > 84 | ssize_t posix_getdents(int, void *, size_t, int); > | ^~~~~~~ > | _ssize_t > --- > newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/dirent.h | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/dirent.h b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/dirent.h > index d44047fa5..6f8ff4278 100644 > --- a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/dirent.h > +++ b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/dirent.h > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ typedef __off_t off_t; > #define _OFF_T_DECLARED > #endif > > +#ifndef _SSIZE_T_DECLARED > +typedef _ssize_t ssize_t; > +#define _SSIZE_T_DECLARED > +#endif > + > typedef struct _dirdesc { > int dd_fd; > long dd_loc; > -- > 2.35.3 Sure, no worries! Or would you rather like a __CYGWIN__ guard? Corinna