From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2DE23858D20 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:30:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E2DE23858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E2DE23858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710153044; cv=none; b=czvlR4uatWdOQ4X61Hm67v9c/XoqWZi8CfwHJNcbySMxHSpTc77WWSTDRUdKe+/0YS+1am6J6lPN5nvIbOBJ38n9TRKeKk3UAeJRaV6vPLe/9bOZI6EW35W8RtvJ/S+C3+gxfj8LRgeE/RgNZetcLhEWspM2gjnO72xEPX1p+Rw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710153044; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rPFvhJ3iMrEcx+lUov9/emQIKDR2mb7ghBieyEGsMb4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=xm42SDlSht8yS2Hz9N6aoK8r0rAEHoBgpqrQoDuSVDBvehCb6vDOSOIDRvjMCFAjklhIFX80DSfqmFpgNFQXW3jwP4rqduTLfZIsaSbdWs3SHJ606sC/2TOXGXKFy+5cV3vtIOi/kqIYNXcv2RNVvlsHVIMuJcCbHUvlOuNgxLg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710153041; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=S7gkUu7ie3zCvjj8+Fr51qWbva1hGdMH2i+Uxvc54Os=; b=XM9rVRv7JwtD1ezm3l6OACwKD3wbhMAkR61AmFMyq8YfZO+QDT4DieZg4ixhug8NtCmPag ortOAOz5RVrvH5Xo+SMaZ+0Ok8aClM9AH/u4vb1Lgvw9RbBuvhUdlQU0dGUGLMtGWNvlJO 2qs1KT9IFiUUgvoSVrSj0R0BiPlekDI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-607-ePGx2fO9OTaiamYD5YBU-Q-1; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:30:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ePGx2fO9OTaiamYD5YBU-Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EC01C0512C; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (unknown [10.39.192.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517983C21; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id EF3DAA80B87; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:30:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:30:37 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: =?utf-8?B?VG9yYmrDtnJu?= SVENSSON Cc: newlib@sourceware.org, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Yvan ROUX Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libc/stdio: Remove wchar_t functions from NEWLIB_NANO_FORMATTED_IO Message-ID: Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: =?utf-8?B?VG9yYmrDtnJu?= SVENSSON , newlib@sourceware.org, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Yvan ROUX References: <20240223153111.3265858-1-torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> <20240309081516.2959834-1-torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20240309081516.2959834-1-torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mar 9 09:15, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote: > Since there was no reply to this, I've regenerated using official > automake-1.15.1 and attached the output. No other change than the > resulting newlib/Makefile.in compared to v1. > > The alternative approach to this patch is to figure out what functions > (in addition to __ssputws_r) that is also needed in nano formatted io. > > Is this ok as-is for master? Yes, I think so. Pushed. Thanks, Corinna