From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F183858C2D
	for <newlib@sourceware.org>; Mon,  7 Nov 2022 17:28:38 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B7F183858C2D
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=foss.arm.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=foss.arm.com
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961651FB;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2022 09:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.2.78.76] (unknown [10.2.78.76])
	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 051973F534;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2022 09:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b25e7c5a-0df0-ed38-881d-98d272b85d65@foss.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:28:36 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Subject: Re: round() on arm vs aarch64
Content-Language: en-GB
To: joel@rtems.org, Newlib <newlib@sourceware.org>
References: <CAF9ehCU6TcXBu1QVGaotssV-RxWKsZ6nT2X2iZGtBRa0qqFBOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF9ehCU6TcXBu1QVGaotssV-RxWKsZ6nT2X2iZGtBRa0qqFBOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3489.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <newlib.sourceware.org>



On 03/11/2022 14:13, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This is likely not a newlib bug but I thought I would start here because
> I'm not sure what is going on and I thought someone on this list would have
> an idea: This is a simple C++ function that calls std::round. It compiles
> on arm but aarch64 says round isn't in the std namespace.
> 
> If you change the program to just use round() and not std::round() it
> compiles on both architectures.
> 
> The compiler versions are the same and report:
> 
> arm-rtems6-gcc (GCC) 12.2.1 20221014 (RTEMS 6, RSB
> cb8821e93378118e78a9cb25859789b126bd5761, Newlib 0b6342c)
> 
> =====================
> $ cat r.cc
> #include <cmath>
> 
> 
> 
> int wrap(double v)
> 
> {
> 
>    double r = std::round((float)v);
> 
>    return (r > 0);
> 
> }
> 
> [joel@devel round]$ arm-rtems6-gcc -Wall -c r.cc
> [joel@devel round]$ aarch64-rtems6-gcc -Wall -c r.cc
> r.cc: In function 'int wrap(double)':
> r.cc:5:19: error: 'round' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'round'?
>      5 |   double r = std::round((float)v);
>        |                   ^~~~~
> In file included from
> /home/joel/rtems-work/tools/6/lib/gcc/aarch64-rtems6/12.2.1/include/c++/cmath:45,
>                   from r.cc:1:
> /home/joel/rtems-work/tools/6/aarch64-rtems6/include/math.h:337:15: note:
> 'round' declared here
>    337 | extern double round (double);
> =====================
> 
> Any ideas what would cause this?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --joel

Have you tried comparing the pre-processed output from the two versions? 
  It might give a clue as to what's going on.

R.