Re: Long double complex methods

[Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>]

On 2017-06-29 07:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 29 13:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 29 12:41, Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
>>> Hello Developers,
>>>
>>> This is the modified patch for csinl.c which reflects changes in Makefile.am.
>>
>> Uhm... this patch now contains *only* the Makefile.am change, but
>> not the expected csinl.c file.
>>
>> v3? ;)
> 
> Never mind, I'm going to apply v1 and v2 of patch 18.  However, usually
> a v2 (or v3, v4, ...) of a patch is expected to replace the v1 of the
> patch entirely, not that it just contains a diff to v1.
> 
> I pushed the set now and regenerated complex/Makefile.in.

This patchset is causing errors when building Cygwin:

newlib/libm/complex/cargl.c: In function  cargl’:
newlib/libm/complex/cargl.c:16:25: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘imag’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
           return atan2l (imag (z), real (z));
                          ^
newlib/libm/complex/cargl.c:16:35: error: implicit declaration of 
function ‘real’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
           return atan2l (imag (z), real (z));
                                    ^

-- 
Yaakov