From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5E9D3858D37 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 04:36:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B5E9D3858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inria.fr DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject; bh=ExZ1ugG+otNZ4wox4iiLWhob9lPDe5+MqipRiGznR6c=; b=kwS01HozHYW2Wn44+Qq9KeA0v/sZQ8mahB7FrQGAMuMhEwtBPyKodw7i gLVjerdVG26szGcIN4E7Yui9xS34W0tdEICTJsy09sLxyWbB5VWLn4DjN vuId6Xme8bdJEciWH3+79no2I4dBo2h1rDAh3zqE+Ryh4cycM4vERbhGZ Y=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,341,1635199200"; d="scan'208";a="19619169" Received: from tomate.loria.fr (HELO tomate) ([152.81.10.51]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Feb 2022 05:36:21 +0100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 05:36:21 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: newlib@sourceware.org Subject: regression in Newlib 4.2.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 04:36:25 -0000 Hi, I noticed a regression in Newlib 4.2.0: Checking exp with newlib-4.2.0.20211231 MPFR library: 4.1.0 MPFR header: 4.1.0 (based on 4.1.0) libm wrong by up to 1.94e+04 ulp(s) for x=0x1.62e302p+6 exp gives inf mpfr_exp gives 0x1.ff691ep+127 Total: errors=17982998 (0.42%) errors2=151 maxerr=1.94e+04 ulp(s) The largest error for expf in Newlib 4.1.0 was 0.911 ulps (https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf). Best regards, Paul