From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: What to do about zlib...
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10664.954456589@upchuck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000330174059.A29263@cygnus.com>
In message < 20000330174059.A29263@cygnus.com >you write:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 03:38:00PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> >
> > In message < 20000330172618.A29064@cygnus.com >you write:
> > > On a slightly related topic, I was wondering if we had any plans to
> > > completely merge the gdb/binutils + gcc repositories. The recent prob
> lem
> > > with libiberty shows that this is something that should be rectified
> > > eventually.
> >I do want to see this happen, but I haven't been up to fighting with RMS
> >over the issue. Plus there is a few technical things to take care of firs
> t
> >on the GCC side to help ensure a smooth transition.
>
> I probably should already know the answer but what is RMS's complaint about
> merging the two repositories?
Nothing specific, mostly because I haven't actually told him I want to do it.
I can envision a few objections on technical & political grounds and I think
I can show none of them hold water, but just haven't taken the plunge.
jeff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: What to do about zlib...
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10664.954456589@upchuck> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000330144900.1tBk7U-d8vlf-WgDRf-MMDyCW8IJdXNOaGd4pN6oAfM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000330174059.A29263@cygnus.com>
In message < 20000330174059.A29263@cygnus.com >you write:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 03:38:00PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> >
> > In message < 20000330172618.A29064@cygnus.com >you write:
> > > On a slightly related topic, I was wondering if we had any plans to
> > > completely merge the gdb/binutils + gcc repositories. The recent prob
> lem
> > > with libiberty shows that this is something that should be rectified
> > > eventually.
> >I do want to see this happen, but I haven't been up to fighting with RMS
> >over the issue. Plus there is a few technical things to take care of firs
> t
> >on the GCC side to help ensure a smooth transition.
>
> I probably should already know the answer but what is RMS's complaint about
> merging the two repositories?
Nothing specific, mostly because I haven't actually told him I want to do it.
I can envision a few objections on technical & political grounds and I think
I can show none of them hold water, but just haven't taken the plunge.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-30 6:08 Chris Faylor
2000-03-30 14:26 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
2000-03-30 14:55 ` Tom Tromey
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-30 16:33 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
2000-03-30 16:55 ` Tom Tromey
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-30 17:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
2000-03-30 17:10 ` Tom Tromey
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-03-30 14:38 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-30 14:41 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
2000-03-30 14:49 ` Jeffrey A Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10664.954456589@upchuck \
--to=law@cygnus.com \
--cc=cgf@cygnus.com \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).