From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14133 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2007 23:32:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 14126 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2007 23:32:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp05.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp05.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:32:34 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1CBXxoe6729954 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:33:59 -0100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.237]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l1BNZxNh160268 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:36:00 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1BNWUX5008052 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:32:30 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1BNWUDM008049; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:32:30 +1100 Received: from [10.61.2.156] (haven.au.ibm.com [9.190.164.82]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA08873746; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:32:29 +1100 (EST) Subject: gcc-cvs commit mail From: Ben Elliston To: overseers@sourceware.org Cc: dberlin@dberlin.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1171236749.9635.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 It seems that the server-side commit scripts for subversion on gcc.gnu.org are truncating Subject: lines. For example: Subject: r121787 - in /trunk/contrib: ChangeLog test_sum... Is there any reason why would do this, as opposed to letting mail clients show as much of the subject lines as possible (and truncating the rest itself)? I find these subject lines too short to be very useful. Cheers, Ben