From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29189 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2008 22:37:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 29179 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Feb 2008 22:37:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from E23SMTP04.au.ibm.com (HELO e23smtp04.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:37:22 +0000 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.234]) by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m15MawNQ005978 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:36:58 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m15MbH553338332 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:37:17 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m15MbH9v000532 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:37:17 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m15MbHa4000526; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:37:17 +1100 Received: from [10.61.2.156] (haven.au.ibm.com [9.190.164.82]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0070E7376F; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:37:17 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: PATCH: GCC's wwwdocs/CVSROOT/modules From: Ben Elliston To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: overseers@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <1202184187.22039.4.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1202251036.8546.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 Hi Gerald > I believe this is fine to commit, but let's wait a day or two to see > whether anybody else has any objections/inputs. In hindsight, this should have been posted to gcc-patches. Sorry to overseers for the noise. > And thanks for looking at the migration of the wwwdocs module. As far as > I can see, the key aspect to consider is the automated checkout following > changes being committed. I didn't realise that wwwdocs was just a module in the gcc repository. The problem with making any changes to the modules file is that the cvs server always refers to the head revision of this file (although it _is_ versioned). If anyone were to want to check out an old version of GCC from CVS, they would need to roll back the modules file first to get the module aliases they might need. I was just suggesting the change as a cleanup. On reflection, I think this change is not worth the effort. Cheers, Ben