From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6573 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2008 05:04:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6565 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2008 05:04:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:03:43 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1F53dlY002048 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:03:39 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m1F53dK1240520 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:03:39 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m1F53cEw018129 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:03:39 -0500 Received: from [9.67.161.53] (wecm-9-67-161-53.wecm.ibm.com [9.67.161.53]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m1F53bwt018100; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:03:37 -0500 Subject: Re: Create a libc-help mailing list for the GNU Libc project. From: "Ryan S. Arnold" Reply-To: rsa@us.ibm.com To: Andrew Pinski Cc: overseers@sourceware.org, Roland McGrath , "Carlos O'Donell" In-Reply-To: References: <47B4A30F.9070905@codesourcery.com> <20080214213508.GA7537@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080214234543.7A973270195@magilla.localdomain> <20080214235447.GA8051@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1203051740.16053.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 17:57 -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Christopher Faylor > wrote: > > Sorry. I'm a little confused. > > > > So, this would make libc-alpha into a moderated list and introduce an > > unmoderated libc-help, right? > > Aren't you making developing glibc harder and not easier? Andrew, Quite the opposite. Currently those trying to learn GLIBC development and those trying to learn the glibc configure/make/install system are kicked to the curb and never come back. Our intention for 'moderation' is to simply guide the non-development related questions to the libc-help mailing list. I don't think that any moderation that Carlos and I do will be any more harsh than that which currently exists. I certainly don't intend to filter any emails. Regards, Ryan