From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: law@redhat.com
To: cgd@netbsd.org (Chris G. Demetriou)
Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Request from Chris Demetriou 
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <13343.974852107@upchuck>
References: <87em05jfjs.fsf@mail.netbsd.org>
X-SW-Source: 2000/msg01343.html

  In message < 87em05jfjs.fsf@mail.netbsd.org >you write:
  > Two questions:
  > 
  > (1) seems that this is a cvs-only account.  No problem with that, but
  >     could i have you add the following additional authorized key:
  > 
  > 1024 33 1099239929804193115914405165337274956993964691247972631606443719141
  > 633720841357862435930194452430331665099777648408292322355332219967733921647
  > 689100253152019582073438392593074682752341724505984452485340681872170841819
  > 482390026887040578752162508444706646163362979825045975205661829856849757527
  > 28062613462603429 cgd@kickme.demetriou.com
Done.


  > (2) Does the account (and write-after-approval access for binutils)
  >     also give me write-after-approval access for e.g. gcc as well.  (I
  >     figure it probably does technically, but possibly not
  >     'politically.'  8-)
Normally the answer would be no.  However, I botched things and put you in
the wrong default group.  Rather than fix it, I just left it since we'll
probably want you to have gcc access soon too :-)

jeff

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: law@redhat.com
To: cgd@netbsd.org (Chris G. Demetriou)
Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Request from Chris Demetriou 
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:13:00 -0000
Message-ID: <13343.974852107@upchuck>
References: <87em05jfjs.fsf@mail.netbsd.org>
X-SW-Source: 2000-q4/msg00213.html
Message-ID: <20001121161300.lJ5qxAn_iS6QnoAmPpEBcvNqyixA1_j-NsVBXdbeN1E@z>

  In message < 87em05jfjs.fsf@mail.netbsd.org >you write:
  > Two questions:
  > 
  > (1) seems that this is a cvs-only account.  No problem with that, but
  >     could i have you add the following additional authorized key:
  > 
  > 1024 33 1099239929804193115914405165337274956993964691247972631606443719141
  > 633720841357862435930194452430331665099777648408292322355332219967733921647
  > 689100253152019582073438392593074682752341724505984452485340681872170841819
  > 482390026887040578752162508444706646163362979825045975205661829856849757527
  > 28062613462603429 cgd@kickme.demetriou.com
Done.


  > (2) Does the account (and write-after-approval access for binutils)
  >     also give me write-after-approval access for e.g. gcc as well.  (I
  >     figure it probably does technically, but possibly not
  >     'politically.'  8-)
Normally the answer would be no.  However, I botched things and put you in
the wrong default group.  Rather than fix it, I just left it since we'll
probably want you to have gcc access soon too :-)

jeff