From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Jim Kingdon Cc: jlarmour@redhat.com, overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: A patch for toplevel Makefile.in Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000320173537.B9530@cygnus.com> References: <20000310125542.A6624@valinux.com> <38CD8CF3.CA81E01@cygnus.com> <38D69095.D3E30D4C@redhat.co.uk> <200003202111.QAA08994@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00053.html Message-ID: <20000320143500.38gA4_v4b9rn91-lIvxWBj-Z0G7w85Vca8MFrOVe9aU@z> Hi - On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:11:02PM -0500, Jim Kingdon wrote: > Speaking of which, can the relevant people (gdb maintainer(s), > binutils maintainer, newlib maintainer, whoever) get together and pick > a project leader(s) for the "src" project? How about "srcmasters" mailing list with a union of subtree maintainers? > [...] But I'm not sure who > is supposed to decide these things the way things are now. Would someone object if you "just do it"? - FChE -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE41qe5VZbdDOm/ZT0RAZI9AJ0WfudQ2Esb5MJn3cSdECXU+Qj9PACdElrs OVIKETMGL3M9AEqM0lD603Q= =i+uW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----