From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Kingdon To: jlarmour@redhat.com Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: A patch for toplevel Makefile.in Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <200003202111.QAA08994@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20000310125542.A6624@valinux.com> <38CD8CF3.CA81E01@cygnus.com> <38D69095.D3E30D4C@redhat.co.uk> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00225.html > Perhaps we should consider adding a src-patches@sourceware list? Speaking of which, can the relevant people (gdb maintainer(s), binutils maintainer, newlib maintainer, whoever) get together and pick a project leader(s) for the "src" project? Right now people are sending me things like changes to the modules file, and that really should be a project issue rather than a sourceware issue. P.S. src-patches@sourceware sounds good to me. But I'm not sure who is supposed to decide these things the way things are now. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Kingdon To: jlarmour@redhat.com Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: A patch for toplevel Makefile.in Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <200003202111.QAA08994@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20000310125542.A6624@valinux.com> <38CD8CF3.CA81E01@cygnus.com> <38D69095.D3E30D4C@redhat.co.uk> X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00052.html Message-ID: <20000320131100.rzGacuE_DXSshPC-j1LsvrNTH5n60rjKkQ7W6gOyh4w@z> > Perhaps we should consider adding a src-patches@sourceware list? Speaking of which, can the relevant people (gdb maintainer(s), binutils maintainer, newlib maintainer, whoever) get together and pick a project leader(s) for the "src" project? Right now people are sending me things like changes to the modules file, and that really should be a project issue rather than a sourceware issue. P.S. src-patches@sourceware sounds good to me. But I'm not sure who is supposed to decide these things the way things are now.