From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Edwards To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: A patch for toplevel Makefile.in [and a gnatsweb problem] Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <200003241624.LAA06864@jaj.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00250.html Tom Tromey : > Phil> On a different subject, Jim Kingdon suggested that I send this > Phil> gnatsweb problem to overseers. If gnatsweb is Not Your > Phil> Problem[tm], the rest of my babbling can be skipped. > > I haven't seen or heard of your gnatsweb problem before. > I recommend contacting bug-gnats@gnu.org. > That is where the Gnats hackers live. > > If they say that you should upgrade gnatsweb, report back to overseers. Here's my report back. A couple other people have complained about this same problem on the libstdc++ lists since I mentioned it here. This message http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/bug-gnats/2000-03/msg00043.html follows up my bug report to bug-gnats, confirms the same problem, and says that the 2.7 beta of gnatsweb doesn't suffer from this problem. Whether this is enough recommendation to warrant an upgrade or not is up to y'all; I'd say yes, but then I have something to gain from it. :-) According to another recent message on bug-gnats (msg00045), the gnatsweb maintainer has apparently moved with no forwarding address. (Or could be sick, etc.) Phil From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Edwards To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: A patch for toplevel Makefile.in [and a gnatsweb problem] Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <200003241624.LAA06864@jaj.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00077.html Message-ID: <20000324081200.9UTciR1G5q2t-XRdOxPdBSjGtrglQDztJzhQE3ene7M@z> Tom Tromey : > Phil> On a different subject, Jim Kingdon suggested that I send this > Phil> gnatsweb problem to overseers. If gnatsweb is Not Your > Phil> Problem[tm], the rest of my babbling can be skipped. > > I haven't seen or heard of your gnatsweb problem before. > I recommend contacting bug-gnats@gnu.org. > That is where the Gnats hackers live. > > If they say that you should upgrade gnatsweb, report back to overseers. Here's my report back. A couple other people have complained about this same problem on the libstdc++ lists since I mentioned it here. This message http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/bug-gnats/2000-03/msg00043.html follows up my bug report to bug-gnats, confirms the same problem, and says that the 2.7 beta of gnatsweb doesn't suffer from this problem. Whether this is enough recommendation to warrant an upgrade or not is up to y'all; I'd say yes, but then I have something to gain from it. :-) According to another recent message on bug-gnats (msg00045), the gnatsweb maintainer has apparently moved with no forwarding address. (Or could be sick, etc.) Phil