* [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] @ 2000-12-30 6:08 Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:28 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? cgf ----- Forwarded message from Ron Parker <rparker1@kc.rr.com> ----- From: Ron Parker <rparker1@kc.rr.com> To: cgf@cygnus.com Subject: ssh+cvs is closer Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:16:10 -0500 Using the cvs command that you sent me to day I got further, but recieved a new error. bash-2.03$ export CVS_RSH=ssh bash-2.03$ cvs -d :ext:rdparker@sourceware.cygnus.com:/cvs/src co winsup Enter passphrase for RSA key 'rdparker@localhost.localdomain': Sorry, you don't have read/write access to the history file /cvs/src/CVSROOT/history Permission denied bash-2.03$ ----- End forwarded message ----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-03 22:28 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-03 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? cgf ----- Forwarded message from Ron Parker <rparker1@kc.rr.com> ----- From: Ron Parker <rparker1@kc.rr.com> To: cgf@cygnus.com Subject: ssh+cvs is closer Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:16:10 -0500 Using the cvs command that you sent me to day I got further, but recieved a new error. bash-2.03$ export CVS_RSH=ssh bash-2.03$ cvs -d :ext:rdparker@sourceware.cygnus.com:/cvs/src co winsup Enter passphrase for RSA key 'rdparker@localhost.localdomain': Sorry, you don't have read/write access to the history file /cvs/src/CVSROOT/history Permission denied bash-2.03$ ----- End forwarded message ----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:28 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:38 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 1 sibling, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Faylor; +Cc: overseers In message < 20000404012844.B16100@cygnus.com >you write: > Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? He's probably not in the right group. Is he in the "src" group? jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-03 22:38 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-03 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Faylor; +Cc: overseers In message < 20000404012844.B16100@cygnus.com >you write: > Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? He's probably not in the right group. Is he in the "src" group? jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:38 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:42 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: overseers On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:38:20PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: >In message < 20000404012844.B16100@cygnus.com >you write: >>Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? >He's probably not in the right group. > >Is he in the "src" group? Nope. It doesn't look like he is. Can somebody with root permission add him? cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-03 22:42 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-03 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: overseers On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:38:20PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: >In message < 20000404012844.B16100@cygnus.com >you write: >>Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? >He's probably not in the right group. > >Is he in the "src" group? Nope. It doesn't look like he is. Can somebody with root permission add him? cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:42 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:53 ` Jeffrey A Law ` (3 more replies) 1 sibling, 4 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Faylor; +Cc: overseers In message < 20000404014208.A21174@cygnus.com >you write: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:38:20PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > >In message < 20000404012844.B16100@cygnus.com >you write: > >>Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? > >He's probably not in the right group. > > > >Is he in the "src" group? > > Nope. It doesn't look like he is. > > Can somebody with root permission add him? Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-03 22:53 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-03 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Faylor; +Cc: overseers In message < 20000404014208.A21174@cygnus.com >you write: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:38:20PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > >In message < 20000404012844.B16100@cygnus.com >you write: > >>Can anyone explain the error below? If so, is it fixable? > >He's probably not in the right group. > > > >Is he in the "src" group? > > Nope. It doesn't look like he is. > > Can somebody with root permission add him? Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:53 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:55 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 3 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: overseers On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:53:06PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: >In message < 20000404014208.A21174@cygnus.com >you write: >> Can somebody with root permission add him? > >Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a default group >of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding folks with default groups >of "gcc" or "src" now. Thanks, Jeff. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-03 22:55 ` Chris Faylor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-03 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: overseers On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:53:06PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: >In message < 20000404014208.A21174@cygnus.com >you write: >> Can somebody with root permission add him? > >Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a default group >of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding folks with default groups >of "gcc" or "src" now. Thanks, Jeff. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:53 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-04 11:01 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 3 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Chris Faylor, overseers On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:53:06PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a default group > of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding folks with default groups > of "gcc" or "src" now. It makes some sense to still make user's default group be the group that they actually participate in. e.g. Chris gives write permissions to Joe Schmoe, and a year later Joe starts doing lame things on the system. The sourceware admin can look at Joe's account, see that Joe's default group is 'cygwin', and can have Chris talk with the guy. If that were done, then Joe would be added to /etc/group:src so he'd have write access to the repository. I'm not real committed to this particular scheme, though; it may be a little silly with the advent of the all-holding src repo. :-) > I think we should only be adding folks with default groups > of "gcc" or "src" now. There are ~20-30 different projects on sourceware, only a couple of which are in the src repo. We'll have to keep the other groups around for along time still. J ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-04 11:01 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-04 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Chris Faylor, overseers On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:53:06PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a default group > of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding folks with default groups > of "gcc" or "src" now. It makes some sense to still make user's default group be the group that they actually participate in. e.g. Chris gives write permissions to Joe Schmoe, and a year later Joe starts doing lame things on the system. The sourceware admin can look at Joe's account, see that Joe's default group is 'cygwin', and can have Chris talk with the guy. If that were done, then Joe would be added to /etc/group:src so he'd have write access to the repository. I'm not real committed to this particular scheme, though; it may be a little silly with the advent of the all-holding src repo. :-) > I think we should only be adding folks with default groups > of "gcc" or "src" now. There are ~20-30 different projects on sourceware, only a couple of which are in the src repo. We'll have to keep the other groups around for along time still. J ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-04 11:01 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 11:12 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, Chris Faylor, overseers Jason> If that were done, then Joe would be added to /etc/group:src so Jason> he'd have write access to the repository. That plan sounds good. We could change the add-a-user script to understand this. How does that sound? T ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-04 11:12 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-04 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, Chris Faylor, overseers Jason> If that were done, then Joe would be added to /etc/group:src so Jason> he'd have write access to the repository. That plan sounds good. We could change the add-a-user script to understand this. How does that sound? T ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 6:50 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 3 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law; +Cc: Chris Faylor, overseers Jeff> Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a Jeff> default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding Jeff> folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are deprecated. Could we just delete them? Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-04 6:50 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-04 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law; +Cc: Chris Faylor, overseers Jeff> Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a Jeff> default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding Jeff> folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are deprecated. Could we just delete them? Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 6:50 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-04 10:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 1 sibling, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: Chris Faylor, overseers In message < 200004041350.GAA03612@ferrule.cygnus.com >you write: > Jeff> Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a > Jeff> default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding > Jeff> folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. > > Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, > e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are > deprecated. Could we just delete them? Yea, I believe they can go away. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-04 10:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-04 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: Chris Faylor, overseers In message < 200004041350.GAA03612@ferrule.cygnus.com >you write: > Jeff> Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a > Jeff> default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding > Jeff> folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. > > Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, > e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are > deprecated. Could we just delete them? Yea, I believe they can go away. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-04 10:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-04 10:42 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Tom Tromey, overseers On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 11:40:18AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > In message < 200004041350.GAA03612@ferrule.cygnus.com >you write: > > Jeff> Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a > > Jeff> default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding > > Jeff> folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. > > > > Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, > > e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are > > deprecated. Could we just delete them? >Yea, I believe they can go away. Of course, it would be nice to be able to exercise some control over who can checkin what and where, someday... cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-04 10:42 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-04-04 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Tom Tromey, overseers On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 11:40:18AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > In message < 200004041350.GAA03612@ferrule.cygnus.com >you write: > > Jeff> Done. Basically someone probably goof'd and added him with a > > Jeff> default group of "cygwin". I think we should only be adding > > Jeff> folks with default groups of "gcc" or "src" now. > > > > Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, > > e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are > > deprecated. Could we just delete them? >Yea, I believe they can go away. Of course, it would be nice to be able to exercise some control over who can checkin what and where, someday... cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-04 10:42 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-04 11:11 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Faylor; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, Tom Tromey, overseers On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: > > > Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, > > > e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are > > > deprecated. Could we just delete them? > >Yea, I believe they can go away. They're still being used for the web pages for those projects. Each one of these projects has a repository for its web pages, and that repository is all group owned. This is on one of my TODO lists to clean up. Actually, I should have mentioned this earlier when I was talking about how users should be placed in "cygwin" if that is their true group, not "src". Group permissions are used in a couple of other parts of the system in addition to the cvs repositories to grant permissions. The first one that comes to mind is the ftp directories. You can only put something in ~ftp/pub/gdb if you are in group gdb, and this makes good sense. IMHO we should keep people in their real groups and add them in 'src' as an additional thing. > Of course, it would be nice to be able to exercise some control over who > can checkin what and where, someday... Hey, you know, I was just reading about how you can use scripts called out from the commitinfo script to implement access control lists. Using this kind of thing, people could have write access to the whole /cvs/src repo, but could be specifically allowed to write to only certain subdirs. If someone tried to commit a change in a dir where they shouldn't, the commit would fail (if I understand correctly). It'd have to be hacked in together with the callout for the cvs log message generator, but I think the all-matching pattern "ALL" could be used for that and directory-specific entries could be used for the ACL-type program. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-04 11:11 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-04 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Faylor; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, Tom Tromey, overseers On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: > > > Me. There are plenty of other default groups that make sense, > > > e.g. automake. I guess some groups, like binutils or gdb, are > > > deprecated. Could we just delete them? > >Yea, I believe they can go away. They're still being used for the web pages for those projects. Each one of these projects has a repository for its web pages, and that repository is all group owned. This is on one of my TODO lists to clean up. Actually, I should have mentioned this earlier when I was talking about how users should be placed in "cygwin" if that is their true group, not "src". Group permissions are used in a couple of other parts of the system in addition to the cvs repositories to grant permissions. The first one that comes to mind is the ftp directories. You can only put something in ~ftp/pub/gdb if you are in group gdb, and this makes good sense. IMHO we should keep people in their real groups and add them in 'src' as an additional thing. > Of course, it would be nice to be able to exercise some control over who > can checkin what and where, someday... Hey, you know, I was just reading about how you can use scripts called out from the commitinfo script to implement access control lists. Using this kind of thing, people could have write access to the whole /cvs/src repo, but could be specifically allowed to write to only certain subdirs. If someone tried to commit a change in a dir where they shouldn't, the commit would fail (if I understand correctly). It'd have to be hacked in together with the callout for the cvs log message generator, but I think the all-matching pattern "ALL" could be used for that and directory-specific entries could be used for the ACL-type program. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-04 11:11 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 11:14 ` Tom Tromey 1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Chris Faylor, Jeffrey A Law, Tom Tromey, overseers Jason> Hey, you know, I was just reading about how you can use scripts Jason> called out from the commitinfo script to implement access Jason> control lists. This is what subversions does. They have one big cvs repository. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-04 11:14 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-04 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Chris Faylor, Jeffrey A Law, Tom Tromey, overseers Jason> Hey, you know, I was just reading about how you can use scripts Jason> called out from the commitinfo script to implement access Jason> control lists. This is what subversions does. They have one big cvs repository. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2000-12-30 6:08 [rparker1@kc.rr.com: ssh+cvs is closer] Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:28 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:38 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:42 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-03 22:53 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-03 22:55 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-04 11:01 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 11:12 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 6:50 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-04 10:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-04-04 10:42 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-04 11:11 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-04 11:14 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).