From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: Jim Kingdon Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Renaming sourceware Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000404134949.C28702@cygnus.com> References: <200004041428.KAA03588@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00329.html On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: >Suggested names > > * Sources.redhat.com (can be pronounced "sources.redhat"). Could we somehow fit the feeling that these are actively developed projects into the name? source-projects.redhat.com (probably too long) source-forum.redhat.com source-home.redhat.com (or without the dashes) cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: Jim Kingdon Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Renaming sourceware Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000404134949.C28702@cygnus.com> References: <200004041428.KAA03588@devserv.devel.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q2/msg00022.html Message-ID: <20000404104900.c4b6BpeACa31a4RPUJQoaDgGVptS4qpM1-UeoSQQtrQ@z> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: >Suggested names > > * Sources.redhat.com (can be pronounced "sources.redhat"). Could we somehow fit the feeling that these are actively developed projects into the name? source-projects.redhat.com (probably too long) source-forum.redhat.com source-home.redhat.com (or without the dashes) cgf