From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Molenda To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Tom Tromey , overseers , Jim Blandy , krk@cygnus.com, wilson@cygnus.com Subject: Re: dejagnu group Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000412002350.A10419@shell17.ba.best.com> References: <38F4115B.EC6098A@cygnus.com> <200004120613.XAA12735@ferrule.cygnus.com> <38F41730.5075FD59@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00354.html On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 04:26:56PM +1000, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Tom Tromey wrote: > > Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? > > I have a patch I'd like to check in. > The official dejagnu sources are on http://sourceforge .. I'd > suggest submit the patch there and also apply the change to the local > mostly maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. We went over all of this on a Cygnus internal list months ago. Rob's repository on sourceforge is nothing but our own dejagnu. He hasn't added a single change in the fourteen months that he has had a separate repository--he's just imported changes that have been made at Cygnus. More importantly, Rob's repository is _still_ an unsanitized tree that he copied from Cygnus when he left. A Cygnus person should get on bmoss/krk to get this resolved -- both bmoss and krk said they would follow up with it quickly, but nothing has changed on the sourceforge repo. The repository, as is, is not acceptable for public consumption. If nothing else, contact VA and get this project pulled. I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and infrastructure is completely stripped. He essentially needs to throw away this repository and start over. It should not be too difficult; as I said earlier, he hasn't done anything of substance on his fork. After his repository is free of confidential information, I'd still not bother coordinating with him unless there was someone actually doing something in that repository. But that's more of a judgement call. Anyway, as for our local repository on sourceware, last I heard, changes to dejagnu are considered a free-for-all, with possible review or oversight by Jim Wilson (he volunteered) if someone wanted to talk with someone about a change. Jason From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Molenda To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Tom Tromey , overseers , Jim Blandy , krk@cygnus.com, wilson@cygnus.com Subject: Re: dejagnu group Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000412002350.A10419@shell17.ba.best.com> References: <38F4115B.EC6098A@cygnus.com> <200004120613.XAA12735@ferrule.cygnus.com> <38F41730.5075FD59@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q2/msg00047.html Message-ID: <20000412002400.vLoTHCn_r455xN3RIMw2V4UnoVggbOkLLBCX37Ddw7s@z> On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 04:26:56PM +1000, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Tom Tromey wrote: > > Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? > > I have a patch I'd like to check in. > The official dejagnu sources are on http://sourceforge .. I'd > suggest submit the patch there and also apply the change to the local > mostly maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. We went over all of this on a Cygnus internal list months ago. Rob's repository on sourceforge is nothing but our own dejagnu. He hasn't added a single change in the fourteen months that he has had a separate repository--he's just imported changes that have been made at Cygnus. More importantly, Rob's repository is _still_ an unsanitized tree that he copied from Cygnus when he left. A Cygnus person should get on bmoss/krk to get this resolved -- both bmoss and krk said they would follow up with it quickly, but nothing has changed on the sourceforge repo. The repository, as is, is not acceptable for public consumption. If nothing else, contact VA and get this project pulled. I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and infrastructure is completely stripped. He essentially needs to throw away this repository and start over. It should not be too difficult; as I said earlier, he hasn't done anything of substance on his fork. After his repository is free of confidential information, I'd still not bother coordinating with him unless there was someone actually doing something in that repository. But that's more of a judgement call. Anyway, as for our local repository on sourceware, last I heard, changes to dejagnu are considered a free-for-all, with possible review or oversight by Jim Wilson (he volunteered) if someone wanted to talk with someone about a change. Jason