* dejagnu group @ 2000-12-30 6:08 Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Cagney ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers Hi, Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to move a few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 dejagnu group Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-11 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers Hi, Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to move a few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 dejagnu group Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-11 23:19 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: overseers In message < 38F4115B.EC6098A@cygnus.com >you write: > Hi, > > Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to move a > few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. Done. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-11 23:19 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-11 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: overseers In message < 38F4115B.EC6098A@cygnus.com >you write: > Hi, > > Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to move a > few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. Done. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 dejagnu group Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-11 23:13 ` Tom Tromey ` (2 more replies) 2 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: overseers Andrew> Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to Andrew> move a few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. Done. Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? I have a patch I'd like to check in. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-11 23:13 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-11 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: overseers Andrew> Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to Andrew> move a few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. Done. Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? I have a patch I'd like to check in. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-11 23:13 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:26 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey, Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: overseers Tom Tromey and Jeff Law wrote: > > Andrew> Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to > Andrew> move a few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. > > Done. Thanks, Thanks. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-11 23:26 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-11 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey, Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: overseers Tom Tromey and Jeff Law wrote: > > Andrew> Could someone please add me to the dejagnu group. I'd like to > Andrew> move a few files into the old dejagnu ftp directory. > > Done. Thanks, Thanks. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-11 23:13 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:28 ` Andrew Cagney ` (2 more replies) 2 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: overseers, Jim Blandy Tom Tromey wrote: > Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? > I have a patch I'd like to check in. The official dejagnu sources are on http://sourceforge .<something>. I'd suggest submit the patch there and also apply the change to the local mostly maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. I think Jim Blandy was also keeping an eye on the local dejagnu. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-11 23:28 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-11 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: overseers, Jim Blandy Tom Tromey wrote: > Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? > I have a patch I'd like to check in. The official dejagnu sources are on http://sourceforge .<something>. I'd suggest submit the patch there and also apply the change to the local mostly maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. I think Jim Blandy was also keeping an eye on the local dejagnu. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:28 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-12 8:06 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Tom Tromey, overseers, Jim Blandy Andrew> The official dejagnu sources are on Andrew> http://sourceforge .<something>. I'd suggest submit the patch Andrew> there and also apply the change to the local mostly Andrew> maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. I sent the patch to Rob already. I'm just going to give myself write permission for the sourceware dejagnu. T ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-12 8:06 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-04-12 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Tom Tromey, overseers, Jim Blandy Andrew> The official dejagnu sources are on Andrew> http://sourceforge .<something>. I'd suggest submit the patch Andrew> there and also apply the change to the local mostly Andrew> maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. I sent the patch to Rob already. I'm just going to give myself write permission for the sourceware dejagnu. T ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:28 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-12 0:24 ` Jason Molenda ` (2 more replies) 2 siblings, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Tom Tromey, overseers, Jim Blandy, krk, wilson On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 04:26:56PM +1000, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Tom Tromey wrote: > > Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? > > I have a patch I'd like to check in. > The official dejagnu sources are on http://sourceforge .<something>. I'd > suggest submit the patch there and also apply the change to the local > mostly maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. We went over all of this on a Cygnus internal list months ago. Rob's repository on sourceforge is nothing but our own dejagnu. He hasn't added a single change in the fourteen months that he has had a separate repository--he's just imported changes that have been made at Cygnus. More importantly, Rob's repository is _still_ an unsanitized tree that he copied from Cygnus when he left. A Cygnus person should get on bmoss/krk to get this resolved -- both bmoss and krk said they would follow up with it quickly, but nothing has changed on the sourceforge repo. The repository, as is, is not acceptable for public consumption. If nothing else, contact VA and get this project pulled. I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and infrastructure is completely stripped. He essentially needs to throw away this repository and start over. It should not be too difficult; as I said earlier, he hasn't done anything of substance on his fork. After his repository is free of confidential information, I'd still not bother coordinating with him unless there was someone actually doing something in that repository. But that's more of a judgement call. Anyway, as for our local repository on sourceware, last I heard, changes to dejagnu are considered a free-for-all, with possible review or oversight by Jim Wilson (he volunteered) if someone wanted to talk with someone about a change. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-12 0:24 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-12 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Tom Tromey, overseers, Jim Blandy, krk, wilson On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 04:26:56PM +1000, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Tom Tromey wrote: > > Who makes decisions about write access for dejagnu? > > I have a patch I'd like to check in. > The official dejagnu sources are on http://sourceforge .<something>. I'd > suggest submit the patch there and also apply the change to the local > mostly maintenance branch. I assume it is nothing radical. We went over all of this on a Cygnus internal list months ago. Rob's repository on sourceforge is nothing but our own dejagnu. He hasn't added a single change in the fourteen months that he has had a separate repository--he's just imported changes that have been made at Cygnus. More importantly, Rob's repository is _still_ an unsanitized tree that he copied from Cygnus when he left. A Cygnus person should get on bmoss/krk to get this resolved -- both bmoss and krk said they would follow up with it quickly, but nothing has changed on the sourceforge repo. The repository, as is, is not acceptable for public consumption. If nothing else, contact VA and get this project pulled. I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and infrastructure is completely stripped. He essentially needs to throw away this repository and start over. It should not be too difficult; as I said earlier, he hasn't done anything of substance on his fork. After his repository is free of confidential information, I'd still not bother coordinating with him unless there was someone actually doing something in that repository. But that's more of a judgement call. Anyway, as for our local repository on sourceware, last I heard, changes to dejagnu are considered a free-for-all, with possible review or oversight by Jim Wilson (he volunteered) if someone wanted to talk with someone about a change. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-12 0:24 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-12 8:55 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda Cc: Andrew Cagney, Tom Tromey, overseers, Jim Blandy, krk, wilson In message < 20000412002350.A10419@shell17.ba.best.com >you write: > More importantly, Rob's repository is _still_ an unsanitized tree > that he copied from Cygnus when he left. A Cygnus person should > get on bmoss/krk to get this resolved -- both bmoss and krk said > they would follow up with it quickly, but nothing has changed on > the sourceforge repo. The repository, as is, is not acceptable > for public consumption. If nothing else, contact VA and get this > project pulled. What needs to happen is for someone from Cygnus to review the code and find any unsanitary bits. Rob has pulled bits that I pointed out were still secret -- that was before the repo went up on sourceforge -- at least he said he pulled the secret bits, I haven't actually followed up and checked. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-12 8:55 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-04-12 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda Cc: Andrew Cagney, Tom Tromey, overseers, Jim Blandy, krk, wilson In message < 20000412002350.A10419@shell17.ba.best.com >you write: > More importantly, Rob's repository is _still_ an unsanitized tree > that he copied from Cygnus when he left. A Cygnus person should > get on bmoss/krk to get this resolved -- both bmoss and krk said > they would follow up with it quickly, but nothing has changed on > the sourceforge repo. The repository, as is, is not acceptable > for public consumption. If nothing else, contact VA and get this > project pulled. What needs to happen is for someone from Cygnus to review the code and find any unsanitary bits. Rob has pulled bits that I pointed out were still secret -- that was before the repo went up on sourceforge -- at least he said he pulled the secret bits, I haven't actually followed up and checked. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-12 0:24 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-04-12 5:31 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Kim Knuttila 2 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jason-swarelist; +Cc: ac131313, tromey, overseers, jimb, krk, wilson > I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the > Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and > infrastructure is completely stripped. Information from years ago? Sorry, I just can't see the need to bother. Furthermore, there are pitfalls here (what would it sound like if slashdot reads "Red Hat cracks down on Rob"?). If our customers care, we can't just ignore it, yes. But if it is hypothetical and seems unlikely, I'd probably argue for just not worrying about it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon @ 2000-04-12 5:31 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Kim Knuttila 1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-04-12 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jason-swarelist; +Cc: ac131313, tromey, overseers, jimb, krk, wilson > I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the > Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and > infrastructure is completely stripped. Information from years ago? Sorry, I just can't see the need to bother. Furthermore, there are pitfalls here (what would it sound like if slashdot reads "Red Hat cracks down on Rob"?). If our customers care, we can't just ignore it, yes. But if it is hypothetical and seems unlikely, I'd probably argue for just not worrying about it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-04-12 5:31 ` Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Kim Knuttila 2000-04-12 6:53 ` Kim Knuttila 1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread From: Kim Knuttila @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon, jason-swarelist Cc: ac131313, tromey, overseers, jimb, krk, wilson Bob and Angela went through a process with Rob 2 months ago that was supposed to result in cleaning of bits we cared about. Rob agreed to do it. It sounds like it didn't get done? Anyway, Rob has been pretty agreeable about removing stuff from his tree. I've asked angela and bob to confirm that the desired actions have taken place and if not, resume the discussion with Rob. thx for the heads up. --krk. At 08:31 AM 4/12/00 -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: > > I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the > > Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and > > infrastructure is completely stripped. > >Information from years ago? Sorry, I just can't see the need to >bother. > >Furthermore, there are pitfalls here (what would it sound like if >slashdot reads "Red Hat cracks down on Rob"?). If our customers care, >we can't just ignore it, yes. But if it is hypothetical and seems >unlikely, I'd probably argue for just not worrying about it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: dejagnu group 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Kim Knuttila @ 2000-04-12 6:53 ` Kim Knuttila 0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: Kim Knuttila @ 2000-04-12 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon, jason-swarelist Cc: ac131313, tromey, overseers, jimb, krk, wilson Bob and Angela went through a process with Rob 2 months ago that was supposed to result in cleaning of bits we cared about. Rob agreed to do it. It sounds like it didn't get done? Anyway, Rob has been pretty agreeable about removing stuff from his tree. I've asked angela and bob to confirm that the desired actions have taken place and if not, resume the discussion with Rob. thx for the heads up. --krk. At 08:31 AM 4/12/00 -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: > > I would certainly not cooperate with this repository until the > > Cygnus-internal, customer confidential, information, tags, and > > infrastructure is completely stripped. > >Information from years ago? Sorry, I just can't see the need to >bother. > >Furthermore, there are pitfalls here (what would it sound like if >slashdot reads "Red Hat cracks down on Rob"?). If our customers care, >we can't just ignore it, yes. But if it is hypothetical and seems >unlikely, I'd probably argue for just not worrying about it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2000-12-30 6:08 dejagnu group Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-11 23:19 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-11 23:13 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:26 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-04-11 23:28 ` Andrew Cagney 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey 2000-04-12 8:06 ` Tom Tromey 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-04-12 0:24 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-04-12 8:55 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-04-12 5:31 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Kim Knuttila 2000-04-12 6:53 ` Kim Knuttila
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).