* libc-alpha && libc-hacker
2000-12-30 6:08 libc-alpha && libc-hacker Andreas Jaeger
@ 2000-04-17 11:36 ` Andreas Jaeger
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2000-04-17 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: Ulrich Drepper
Hi,
the libc-alpha and libc-hacker mailing lists are archived on
sourceware. But the software for generating the mailing lists
archives seems to be different and therefore the web pages look
different. Could you modify this so that all lists (perhaps bug-glibc
also) look the same? I'd prefer the layout from libc-hacker.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
currently: aj@oss.sgi.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libc-alpha && libc-hacker
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2000-04-17 11:52 ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-04-17 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: overseers, Ulrich Drepper
Huh, I wonder why I did that.
Uli, if you agree, I can make all three lists (libc-alpha, libc-hacker,
bug-glibc) use the high-volume format (which libc-hacker is using
right now).
Jason
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 08:07:05PM -0700, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the libc-alpha and libc-hacker mailing lists are archived on
> sourceware. But the software for generating the mailing lists
> archives seems to be different and therefore the web pages look
> different. Could you modify this so that all lists (perhaps bug-glibc
> also) look the same? I'd prefer the layout from libc-hacker.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Jaeger
> SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
> private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
> currently: aj@oss.sgi.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libc-alpha && libc-hacker
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
@ 2000-04-17 11:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2000-04-17 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Andreas Jaeger, overseers
Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com> writes:
> Uli, if you agree, I can make all three lists (libc-alpha, libc-hacker,
> bug-glibc) use the high-volume format (which libc-hacker is using
> right now).
No problem. Please go on.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libc-alpha && libc-hacker
2000-12-30 6:08 libc-alpha && libc-hacker Andreas Jaeger
2000-04-17 11:36 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
2000-04-17 11:52 ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: overseers, Ulrich Drepper
Huh, I wonder why I did that.
Uli, if you agree, I can make all three lists (libc-alpha, libc-hacker,
bug-glibc) use the high-volume format (which libc-hacker is using
right now).
Jason
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 08:07:05PM -0700, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the libc-alpha and libc-hacker mailing lists are archived on
> sourceware. But the software for generating the mailing lists
> archives seems to be different and therefore the web pages look
> different. Could you modify this so that all lists (perhaps bug-glibc
> also) look the same? I'd prefer the layout from libc-hacker.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
> --
> Andreas Jaeger
> SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
> private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
> currently: aj@oss.sgi.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* libc-alpha && libc-hacker
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 Andreas Jaeger
2000-04-17 11:36 ` Andreas Jaeger
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: Ulrich Drepper
Hi,
the libc-alpha and libc-hacker mailing lists are archived on
sourceware. But the software for generating the mailing lists
archives seems to be different and therefore the web pages look
different. Could you modify this so that all lists (perhaps bug-glibc
also) look the same? I'd prefer the layout from libc-hacker.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de
currently: aj@oss.sgi.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libc-alpha && libc-hacker
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
2000-04-17 11:52 ` Jason Molenda
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
2000-04-17 11:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Andreas Jaeger, overseers
Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com> writes:
> Uli, if you agree, I can make all three lists (libc-alpha, libc-hacker,
> bug-glibc) use the high-volume format (which libc-hacker is using
> right now).
No problem. Please go on.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-30 6:08 libc-alpha && libc-hacker Andreas Jaeger
2000-04-17 11:36 ` Andreas Jaeger
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
2000-04-17 11:52 ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Ulrich Drepper
2000-04-17 11:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).