From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests? (fwd)
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 02:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20000527025014.A10144@shell17.ba.best.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005261834080.620-100000@nunki.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
X-SW-Source: 2000-q2/msg00285.html
Message-ID: <20000527025000.nfnNVFTE7wD7XX-MK1QoV8XU9hDeMkmmVE0bbAXm3HA@z>

On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 06:34:58PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> He contacted my directly, but as I'm not involved with the mailing lists
> at all, could any of you please have a look?

I doubt anyone was changing ezmlm at this level recently - I'm the
only one who has really delved into the gory details of ezmlm and
I know I haven't touched it in several months.  Unless Jeff was
tweaking one of the gcc lists somehow recently, I can't offer any
explanation about why the digest function would behave differently
from how it normally behaves.

Sorry I can't provide any better analysis on this one,

Jason