From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: [kshiring@nc.rr.com: [postmaster@sourceware] Fwd: failure notice] Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000626205837.A10283@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00699.html Does anyone have any ideas why this person is blocked? He doesn't seem to be in the ORBS database. cgf ----- Forwarded message from Ken Shiring ----- From: Ken Shiring To: postmaster@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [postmaster@sourceware] Fwd: failure notice Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:46:38 -0400 Your mailer daemon claims that my mail relay is on ORBS. This is verifiably false, and I am not listed in any of the other open relay lists either. Can you please investigate this delivery failure so I can post to the 'gcc' list? Thanks. >Date: 26 Jun 2000 03:22:42 -0000 >From: MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com >To: kshiring@nc.rr.com >Subject: failure notice > >Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com. >I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. >This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > >: > > In an effort to cut down on our spam intake we block email from > certain lists and unfortunately you have just discovered the hard > way that sometimes non-spam mail gets caught accidentally. > In most cases you can clear this up by an upgrade to your mail > server or sometimes by getting an erroneous listing removed. > For more information about our use of these lists, see > http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html > > The IP number that I'm denying mail from is 24.93.67.48 > The list that you're on is ORBS. See: > http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=24.93.67.48 > for more information about this list and why you are on it. > > >--- Below this line is a copy of the message. > >Return-Path: >Received: (qmail 21333 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2000 03:22:42 -0000 >Received: from fe1.southeast.rr.com (HELO mail1.nc.rr.com) (24.93.67.48) > by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2000 03:22:42 -0000 >Received: from anticipation ([24.162.224.170]) by mail1.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35); > Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:22:33 -0400 >Message-Id: >X-Sender: KSHIRING@pop-server >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Demo >Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:25:37 -0400 >To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org >From: Ken Shiring >Subject: question about the state of gcc/ppc >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Return-Path: kshiring@nc.rr.com > >Hello all. I am an IBM employee working the the embedded 40x series >PowerPC group (hey to all the other IBMers on this list). I heard from >some 'net source recently that said the PPC port of GCC is very sub-optimal. > >Is there any truth in this? Do the PPC maintainers have an opinion on the >state of the PPC codebase? > >I am asking because I might be interested in joining the battle if PPC >needs help. I can't offer much in the way of compiler design, but I can >offer my understanding of the PPC ISA and processor specific optimizations. > >I am not on the list, so cc: replies accordingly. Keep up the good work. > > >Ken Shiring > > >IBM Microelectronics Division >PEPS Embedded PowerPC design group >Research Triangle Park, NC > Ken Shiring IBM Microelectronics Division PEPS Embedded PowerPC design group Research Triangle Park, NC ----- End forwarded message ----- -- cgf@cygnus.com Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ http://www.redhat.com/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: [kshiring@nc.rr.com: [postmaster@sourceware] Fwd: failure notice] Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000626205837.A10283@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q2/msg00392.html Message-ID: <20000626175800.c3d-e_8ZWQez9xoMrJGEZoX4A9wMaw8MC36MkyfRJ64@z> Does anyone have any ideas why this person is blocked? He doesn't seem to be in the ORBS database. cgf ----- Forwarded message from Ken Shiring ----- From: Ken Shiring To: postmaster@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [postmaster@sourceware] Fwd: failure notice Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:46:38 -0400 Your mailer daemon claims that my mail relay is on ORBS. This is verifiably false, and I am not listed in any of the other open relay lists either. Can you please investigate this delivery failure so I can post to the 'gcc' list? Thanks. >Date: 26 Jun 2000 03:22:42 -0000 >From: MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com >To: kshiring@nc.rr.com >Subject: failure notice > >Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com. >I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. >This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > >: > > In an effort to cut down on our spam intake we block email from > certain lists and unfortunately you have just discovered the hard > way that sometimes non-spam mail gets caught accidentally. > In most cases you can clear this up by an upgrade to your mail > server or sometimes by getting an erroneous listing removed. > For more information about our use of these lists, see > http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html > > The IP number that I'm denying mail from is 24.93.67.48 > The list that you're on is ORBS. See: > http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=24.93.67.48 > for more information about this list and why you are on it. > > >--- Below this line is a copy of the message. > >Return-Path: >Received: (qmail 21333 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2000 03:22:42 -0000 >Received: from fe1.southeast.rr.com (HELO mail1.nc.rr.com) (24.93.67.48) > by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2000 03:22:42 -0000 >Received: from anticipation ([24.162.224.170]) by mail1.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35); > Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:22:33 -0400 >Message-Id: >X-Sender: KSHIRING@pop-server >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Demo >Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:25:37 -0400 >To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org >From: Ken Shiring >Subject: question about the state of gcc/ppc >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Return-Path: kshiring@nc.rr.com > >Hello all. I am an IBM employee working the the embedded 40x series >PowerPC group (hey to all the other IBMers on this list). I heard from >some 'net source recently that said the PPC port of GCC is very sub-optimal. > >Is there any truth in this? Do the PPC maintainers have an opinion on the >state of the PPC codebase? > >I am asking because I might be interested in joining the battle if PPC >needs help. I can't offer much in the way of compiler design, but I can >offer my understanding of the PPC ISA and processor specific optimizations. > >I am not on the list, so cc: replies accordingly. Keep up the good work. > > >Ken Shiring > > >IBM Microelectronics Division >PEPS Embedded PowerPC design group >Research Triangle Park, NC > Ken Shiring IBM Microelectronics Division PEPS Embedded PowerPC design group Research Triangle Park, NC ----- End forwarded message ----- -- cgf@cygnus.com Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ http://www.redhat.com/