* sources.redhat.com is up @ 2000-12-30 6:08 Jim Kingdon 2000-06-29 7:27 ` Jim Kingdon ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers web and ssh seem to work without hitches. email to sources.redhat.com is broken; qmail complains about not being in the locals file but I did edit /qmail/control/locals. Is there a daemon to restart or something? Kerberos I don't even plan to touch at the moment :-). Any volunteers to test GNATS and other things? At the moment I'm off to catch a plane, but here's the todo list as I see it: 1. Get email working. 2. Do a bit of s/sourceware/sources/ 3. Send announcement to sourceware.cygnus.com and the web page. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 sources.redhat.com is up Jim Kingdon @ 2000-06-29 7:27 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson 2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-06-29 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers web and ssh seem to work without hitches. email to sources.redhat.com is broken; qmail complains about not being in the locals file but I did edit /qmail/control/locals. Is there a daemon to restart or something? Kerberos I don't even plan to touch at the moment :-). Any volunteers to test GNATS and other things? At the moment I'm off to catch a plane, but here's the todo list as I see it: 1. Get email working. 2. Do a bit of s/sourceware/sources/ 3. Send announcement to sourceware.cygnus.com and the web page. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 sources.redhat.com is up Jim Kingdon 2000-06-29 7:27 ` Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-06-29 18:56 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson 2 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: overseers In message < 200006291427.KAA00384@devserv.devel.redhat.com >you write: > web and ssh seem to work without hitches. > > email to sources.redhat.com is broken; qmail complains about not being > in the locals file but I did edit /qmail/control/locals. Is there a > daemon to restart or something? Most likely. > Kerberos I don't even plan to touch at the moment :-). We need it to work. Many of the Cygnus folks are using Kerberos to access that machine. > Any volunteers to test GNATS and other things? I can handle FOM when the time comes. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-06-29 18:56 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-06-29 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: overseers In message < 200006291427.KAA00384@devserv.devel.redhat.com >you write: > web and ssh seem to work without hitches. > > email to sources.redhat.com is broken; qmail complains about not being > in the locals file but I did edit /qmail/control/locals. Is there a > daemon to restart or something? Most likely. > Kerberos I don't even plan to touch at the moment :-). We need it to work. Many of the Cygnus folks are using Kerberos to access that machine. > Any volunteers to test GNATS and other things? I can handle FOM when the time comes. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-06-29 18:56 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-07-01 22:23 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers > > email to sources.redhat.com is broken; qmail complains about not being > > in the locals file but I did edit /qmail/control/locals. Is there a > > daemon to restart or something? Yup. This was it (kill -HUP on qmail-send, as described in "man qmail-send"). I've made the switch on the web pages (take a look at http://sources.redhat.com/ ). I've also updated http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rename.html with the status as it exists now. Services like Kerberos and htdig should work but may need to use the old name. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon @ 2000-07-01 22:23 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-07-01 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers > > email to sources.redhat.com is broken; qmail complains about not being > > in the locals file but I did edit /qmail/control/locals. Is there a > > daemon to restart or something? Yup. This was it (kill -HUP on qmail-send, as described in "man qmail-send"). I've made the switch on the web pages (take a look at http://sources.redhat.com/ ). I've also updated http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rename.html with the status as it exists now. Services like Kerberos and htdig should work but may need to use the old name. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-07-01 22:23 ` Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-07-01 23:12 ` Jason Molenda ` (2 more replies) 1 sibling, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: overseers On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:23:49AM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: > I've also updated > http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rename.html with the status as it > exists now. Hm. Just MHO, but I wouldn't expose the overseers list to the world and all its search engines like it is now. It's (obviously) an open list with no limited membership or mailing list archive visibility, but up to now it's been unlinked from the outside world. I guess I have visions of people sending bug reports ("Cygnus ls doesn't list my files on my DOS 3.2 partition!") and such to the list. J / secretly-a-cabal-lover ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-07-01 23:12 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2000-07-01 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: overseers On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:23:49AM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: > I've also updated > http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rename.html with the status as it > exists now. Hm. Just MHO, but I wouldn't expose the overseers list to the world and all its search engines like it is now. It's (obviously) an open list with no limited membership or mailing list archive visibility, but up to now it's been unlinked from the outside world. I guess I have visions of people sending bug reports ("Cygnus ls doesn't list my files on my DOS 3.2 partition!") and such to the list. J / secretly-a-cabal-lover ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-07-01 23:12 ` Jason Molenda @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-07-02 9:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Jim Kingdon, overseers On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 11:11:50PM -0700, Jason Molenda wrote: >On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:23:49AM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: > >> I've also updated >> http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rename.html with the status as it >> exists now. > >Hm. Just MHO, but I wouldn't expose the overseers list to the >world and all its search engines like it is now. It's (obviously) >an open list with no limited membership or mailing list archive >visibility, but up to now it's been unlinked from the outside world. > >I guess I have visions of people sending bug reports ("Cygnus ls >doesn't list my files on my DOS 3.2 partition!") and such to the >list. Hmm. I can't imagine *anyone* sending stuff like that. Why, that would be completely clueless. Oh. Wait. Now that you mention it, I guess I can imagine this. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-07-02 9:08 ` Chris Faylor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-07-02 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: Jim Kingdon, overseers On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 11:11:50PM -0700, Jason Molenda wrote: >On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:23:49AM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: > >> I've also updated >> http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rename.html with the status as it >> exists now. > >Hm. Just MHO, but I wouldn't expose the overseers list to the >world and all its search engines like it is now. It's (obviously) >an open list with no limited membership or mailing list archive >visibility, but up to now it's been unlinked from the outside world. > >I guess I have visions of people sending bug reports ("Cygnus ls >doesn't list my files on my DOS 3.2 partition!") and such to the >list. Hmm. I can't imagine *anyone* sending stuff like that. Why, that would be completely clueless. Oh. Wait. Now that you mention it, I guess I can imagine this. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-07-01 23:12 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-07-02 7:19 ` Jim Kingdon 2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jason-swarelist; +Cc: overseers > Just MHO, but I wouldn't expose the overseers list to the > world and all its search engines like it is now. OK, I've gotten rid of the link from index.html. The main reason I linked to that page was that I wanted to avoid a flurry of reports for problems we already know about. But I guess that isn't a big risk. > I guess I have visions of people sending bug reports ("Cygnus ls > doesn't list my files on my DOS 3.2 partition!") and such to the > list. We get a lot of that at sourcemaster and although they don't take long to answer (one sentence, "use the mailing list, I'm just the sysadmin"), yeah, we'd rather have people find the mailing lists in the first place. To that end, I've reworded http://sources.redhat.com/suggestions.html a bit. Don't know if that page is what is directing people to sourcemaster but it has to be something like that. In my experience as a webmaster, people rarely send in that kind of query without the web site somehow making the address prominent (if it is 4 clicks from the front page, they won't get there, search engines or no search engines). > secretly-a-cabal-lover I don't think I should touch that one :-). Incidentally, I'm now back in the Bay Area (for good), so give me a call sometime (I especially mean Jason, but the rest of you too if you feel so inclined). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon @ 2000-07-02 7:19 ` Jim Kingdon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-07-02 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: jason-swarelist; +Cc: overseers > Just MHO, but I wouldn't expose the overseers list to the > world and all its search engines like it is now. OK, I've gotten rid of the link from index.html. The main reason I linked to that page was that I wanted to avoid a flurry of reports for problems we already know about. But I guess that isn't a big risk. > I guess I have visions of people sending bug reports ("Cygnus ls > doesn't list my files on my DOS 3.2 partition!") and such to the > list. We get a lot of that at sourcemaster and although they don't take long to answer (one sentence, "use the mailing list, I'm just the sysadmin"), yeah, we'd rather have people find the mailing lists in the first place. To that end, I've reworded http://sources.redhat.com/suggestions.html a bit. Don't know if that page is what is directing people to sourcemaster but it has to be something like that. In my experience as a webmaster, people rarely send in that kind of query without the web site somehow making the address prominent (if it is 4 clicks from the front page, they won't get there, search engines or no search engines). > secretly-a-cabal-lover I don't think I should touch that one :-). Incidentally, I'm now back in the Bay Area (for good), so give me a call sometime (I especially mean Jason, but the rest of you too if you feel so inclined). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 sources.redhat.com is up Jim Kingdon 2000-06-29 7:27 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson 2000-06-30 3:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson 2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: overseers On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jim Kingdon wrote: > 2. Do a bit of s/sourceware/sources/ Not a big deal, but the ht://Dig configs for the sourceware side need to be tweaked. A note to overseers in advance with the switchover time would give me enough time, assuming the switchover happens some time the next three weeks. The changes are trivial, you just have to know it has to be done and not forget it. :-) brgds, H-P PS. I'll try to fix some ht://Dig sourdoughs this weekend. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: sources.redhat.com is up 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2000-06-30 3:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2000-06-30 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Kingdon; +Cc: overseers On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jim Kingdon wrote: > 2. Do a bit of s/sourceware/sources/ Not a big deal, but the ht://Dig configs for the sourceware side need to be tweaked. A note to overseers in advance with the switchover time would give me enough time, assuming the switchover happens some time the next three weeks. The changes are trivial, you just have to know it has to be done and not forget it. :-) brgds, H-P PS. I'll try to fix some ht://Dig sourdoughs this weekend. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2000-12-30 6:08 sources.redhat.com is up Jim Kingdon 2000-06-29 7:27 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-06-29 18:56 ` Jeffrey A Law 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-07-01 22:23 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda 2000-07-01 23:12 ` Jason Molenda 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-07-02 9:08 ` Chris Faylor 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-07-02 7:19 ` Jim Kingdon 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson 2000-06-30 3:26 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).