From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: Jim Kingdon Cc: shebs@shebs.cnchost.com, overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: failure notice] Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000707220457.A707@cygnus.com> References: <3965FD54.B898B2FF@shebs.cnchost.com> <200007071643.MAA28635@panix2.panix.com> <20000707183012.C27406@cygnus.com> <200007080146.VAA00415@panix6.panix.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00752.html On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 09:46:01PM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: >> I just fixed one of these in the cygwin-webpages-cvs mailing list. >> I wonder if some of the other cvs mailing lists are similarly affected. > >Ah, *that*'s why one of the outhost files was already updated when I >went to edit them all. I've updated them all en mase (they were almost >all affected as far as I know). > >> I thought it was best to change the contents outhost to *.sources.redhat.com. >> Is that the best way to deal with this for the CVS lists? > >Nit: outhost isn't a wildcard, it is a single hostname (it gets put >into the headers in outgoing mail in a few places). So it is >sources.redhat.com not *.sources.redhat.com. Yeah, I was just using '*' as a shorthand. >Changing outhost to sources.redhat.com instead of adding -T to >ezmlm-reject is OK as long as you know that everything which is >sending email has been moved to sources.redhat.com. If some of the >senders might still be using sourceware.cygnus.com, then the -T (plus >local-mail-only or check-for-listname) solution is how to handle it. Yes. I figured that the cvs mailing lists fell into the former category. cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: Jim Kingdon Cc: shebs@shebs.cnchost.com, overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: failure notice] Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 19:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000707220457.A707@cygnus.com> References: <3965FD54.B898B2FF@shebs.cnchost.com> <200007071643.MAA28635@panix2.panix.com> <20000707183012.C27406@cygnus.com> <200007080146.VAA00415@panix6.panix.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00043.html Message-ID: <20000707190500.GNw4Fw7O7VXK-Tluv3qKB4_r3WBpDePYsPROHK_Arig@z> On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 09:46:01PM -0400, Jim Kingdon wrote: >> I just fixed one of these in the cygwin-webpages-cvs mailing list. >> I wonder if some of the other cvs mailing lists are similarly affected. > >Ah, *that*'s why one of the outhost files was already updated when I >went to edit them all. I've updated them all en mase (they were almost >all affected as far as I know). > >> I thought it was best to change the contents outhost to *.sources.redhat.com. >> Is that the best way to deal with this for the CVS lists? > >Nit: outhost isn't a wildcard, it is a single hostname (it gets put >into the headers in outgoing mail in a few places). So it is >sources.redhat.com not *.sources.redhat.com. Yeah, I was just using '*' as a shorthand. >Changing outhost to sources.redhat.com instead of adding -T to >ezmlm-reject is OK as long as you know that everything which is >sending email has been moved to sources.redhat.com. If some of the >senders might still be using sourceware.cygnus.com, then the -T (plus >local-mail-only or check-for-listname) solution is how to handle it. Yes. I figured that the cvs mailing lists fell into the former category. cgf