From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Kingdon To: cgf@cygnus.com Cc: shebs@shebs.cnchost.com, overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: failure notice] Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <200007080146.VAA00415@panix6.panix.com> References: <3965FD54.B898B2FF@shebs.cnchost.com> <200007071643.MAA28635@panix2.panix.com> <20000707183012.C27406@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00751.html > I just fixed one of these in the cygwin-webpages-cvs mailing list. > I wonder if some of the other cvs mailing lists are similarly affected. Ah, *that*'s why one of the outhost files was already updated when I went to edit them all. I've updated them all en mase (they were almost all affected as far as I know). > I thought it was best to change the contents outhost to *.sources.redhat.com. > Is that the best way to deal with this for the CVS lists? Nit: outhost isn't a wildcard, it is a single hostname (it gets put into the headers in outgoing mail in a few places). So it is sources.redhat.com not *.sources.redhat.com. Changing outhost to sources.redhat.com instead of adding -T to ezmlm-reject is OK as long as you know that everything which is sending email has been moved to sources.redhat.com. If some of the senders might still be using sourceware.cygnus.com, then the -T (plus local-mail-only or check-for-listname) solution is how to handle it. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Kingdon To: cgf@cygnus.com Cc: shebs@shebs.cnchost.com, overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: failure notice] Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 18:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <200007080146.VAA00415@panix6.panix.com> References: <3965FD54.B898B2FF@shebs.cnchost.com> <200007071643.MAA28635@panix2.panix.com> <20000707183012.C27406@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00042.html Message-ID: <20000707184600.yiY4LiY87pQ_o3lCpW_IERADQMF40sfSlz5DZXdf4xM@z> > I just fixed one of these in the cygwin-webpages-cvs mailing list. > I wonder if some of the other cvs mailing lists are similarly affected. Ah, *that*'s why one of the outhost files was already updated when I went to edit them all. I've updated them all en mase (they were almost all affected as far as I know). > I thought it was best to change the contents outhost to *.sources.redhat.com. > Is that the best way to deal with this for the CVS lists? Nit: outhost isn't a wildcard, it is a single hostname (it gets put into the headers in outgoing mail in a few places). So it is sources.redhat.com not *.sources.redhat.com. Changing outhost to sources.redhat.com instead of adding -T to ezmlm-reject is OK as long as you know that everything which is sending email has been moved to sources.redhat.com. If some of the senders might still be using sourceware.cygnus.com, then the -T (plus local-mail-only or check-for-listname) solution is how to handle it.