Re: Exposing hidden projects to ht://Dig indexing

[Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com>]

On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 06:45:56PM -0700, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:23:51PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>> I would like to vote that overseers should definitely not be archived in
>> a public place.
>
>Do you mean that it should not be archived, access to its archives
>should be restricted (e.g. requiring passwords to get at the
>archives), or that we should not advertise links to the archive
>publically?
>
>I personally prefer the latter.  I don't really care about people
>on the net reading these notes--all content here is either technical
>(which I doubt anyone would argue should be hidden) or policy (which
>I guess some could argue should be hidden to avoid repeated debates)
>related.

The latter.

>I do want to keep this list free of random e-mails from folks on
>the net.  If a user/developer on a sourceware project is having a
>problem, that problem should come to the overseers list via that
>project's maintainer.  The maintainer will (with luck) be clueful
>enough to filter out the non-problems and FAQs, and only report
>new, novel problems.

Yup.

cgf