From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: Jason Molenda Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com, Hans-Peter Nilsson Subject: Re: Exposing hidden projects to ht://Dig indexing Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000725215530.A26583@cygnus.com> References: <20000725212351.A16969@cygnus.com> <20000725184556.A23055@shell17.ba.best.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00855.html On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 06:45:56PM -0700, Jason Molenda wrote: >On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:23:51PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >> I would like to vote that overseers should definitely not be archived in >> a public place. > >Do you mean that it should not be archived, access to its archives >should be restricted (e.g. requiring passwords to get at the >archives), or that we should not advertise links to the archive >publically? > >I personally prefer the latter. I don't really care about people >on the net reading these notes--all content here is either technical >(which I doubt anyone would argue should be hidden) or policy (which >I guess some could argue should be hidden to avoid repeated debates) >related. The latter. >I do want to keep this list free of random e-mails from folks on >the net. If a user/developer on a sourceware project is having a >problem, that problem should come to the overseers list via that >project's maintainer. The maintainer will (with luck) be clueful >enough to filter out the non-problems and FAQs, and only report >new, novel problems. Yup. cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: Jason Molenda Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com, Hans-Peter Nilsson Subject: Re: Exposing hidden projects to ht://Dig indexing Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000725215530.A26583@cygnus.com> References: <20000725212351.A16969@cygnus.com> <20000725184556.A23055@shell17.ba.best.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00146.html Message-ID: <20000725185500.6J0QhdWcKBKR9hIuv245gj7HQYf5GalJ7rWAqQT4-_Y@z> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 06:45:56PM -0700, Jason Molenda wrote: >On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:23:51PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >> I would like to vote that overseers should definitely not be archived in >> a public place. > >Do you mean that it should not be archived, access to its archives >should be restricted (e.g. requiring passwords to get at the >archives), or that we should not advertise links to the archive >publically? > >I personally prefer the latter. I don't really care about people >on the net reading these notes--all content here is either technical >(which I doubt anyone would argue should be hidden) or policy (which >I guess some could argue should be hidden to avoid repeated debates) >related. The latter. >I do want to keep this list free of random e-mails from folks on >the net. If a user/developer on a sourceware project is having a >problem, that problem should come to the overseers list via that >project's maintainer. The maintainer will (with luck) be clueful >enough to filter out the non-problems and FAQs, and only report >new, novel problems. Yup. cgf