From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Molenda To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Cc: Jonathan Larmour , overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [Fwd: failure notice] Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20000830131422.A26689@shell17.ba.best.com> References: <39AD4E83.55F4D362@redhat.com> <20000830113053.A23654@shell17.ba.best.com> <20000830120321.A3776@shell17.ba.best.com> <20000830153622.B27245@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00324.html Message-ID: <20000830131500.iJ10-IJIBqYIh7MFBIwclbuuTmaVFy9Q3Guhtua0vXI@z> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:36:22PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: > I looked at the script and I can see why it does fail on two Cc: lines. > I don't see any obvious way to fix this. Are two Cc: lines even legal in > a header? Especially when the first line ends with a comma? I don't know if it's legal, but it got delivered. If it were me, I'd probably say "Don't do that" - this is the first report I've ever seen of someone sending out a msg like that. But if Jonathan thinks it's important enough, he can always dig in to it himself. To fix it, I'd probably add some code to count the number of To: and Cc: lines in the headers, and then loop over them somehow. J