From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stan Shebs To: Jim Kingdon Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com, law@cygnus.com Subject: Re: Haaallllooooo!!! Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 06:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <39AE56C6.F8156AF0@shebs.cnchost.com> References: <39AD4395.E3B7E435@shebs.cnchost.com> <12560.967657010@upchuck> <20000830143852.D26083@cygnus.com> <200008302017.QAA16017@panix2.panix.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00331.html Message-ID: <20000831060000.Vwlxtxh0Gg1rwNV9LrKqhsZP0NPmc1okkOztqlhSfUE@z> Jim Kingdon wrote: > > As for GNATS versus other systems, I see that gnatsweb seems to have a > pointy-clicky file attachment upload feature like bugzilla and the > rest. So it would seem usable for your purposes, Stan. The default gnatsweb setup seems a little ugly compared to the others, but that's something I can tinker with a bit. Nobody does Xconq as part of their job, so it's important to make bug submission as appealing as possible (maybe play a bit of soothing music :-) ) > As for sources.redhat versus sourceforge, I'm in the fun position of > being an admin on both those sites. So it doesn't matter to *me* > which you pick :-). (Both of them have their pros and cons). What bug system does sourceforge use, anyway? I didn't see it identified as one of the standard packages. Stan