From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Kingdon To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: suggested change to sources.redhat.com page Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 13:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <200011012152.QAA26917@panix2.panix.com> References: <3A0055F8.1902A1A5@redhat.com> <20001101103628.A6983@shell17.ba.best.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q4/msg00085.html Message-ID: <20001101135200.BZKfE_ojYPp89glBUfJ1VVYiFkz_hqPRKn2XjOavclM@z> > I don't know who Mark is. Could he be in marketing maybe? :-) :-). I don't know either. For what it is worth, when I was working on the site more actively I tried to keep up the fun, lighthearted tone which Jason set. I mean, it's just the Obvious Thing To Do(TM) when you think about who you want to look at sources.redhat (hint: it isn't buzzword-happy marketing types). So you can either try to reason with him, or just ignore him. Probably the latter. P.S. if no one has yet made contact with the clueful people in marketing, I'd suggest it. Emily Forster does university relations and user groups and is very community-aware. Melissa London (PR) and Nikki Bass (shows) you might have met at trade shows - they're both clueful although they tend to be busy and not necessarily coming up with messages anyway. People like Billy Marshall, Craig Delger, &c are more suit-like (which is good and useful in its own way, just not too relevant to sources.redhat...).