From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Faylor To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: failure notice Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 13:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20001103163154.Q17861@redhat.com> References: <200011032130.eA3LUjD14264@mail.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q4/msg00108.html Message-ID: <20001103133200.1m9_V_BVZre8tiHjZLlB1oNbUXKC-L8C76S4-bTLrW8@z> Well, *now* it certainly works... cgf On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:30:43PM -0000, MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com wrote: >Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com. >I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. >This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > >: >/ Mail note rejected: List address must be in To: or Cc: headers. > > >--- Below this line is a copy of the message. > >Return-Path: >Received: (qmail 28970 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000 >Received: from runyon.cygnus.com (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) > by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000 >Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (loony.cygnus.com [205.180.230.181]) > by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25910 > for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:30:41 -0800 (PST) >Received: (from cgf@localhost) > by rtl.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id QAA19044 > for overseers@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500 >Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500 >From: Christopher Faylor >To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org >Subject: Re: GNATS write access >Message-ID: <20001103163029.P17861@redhat.com> >Reply-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com >Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org >References: < 200011031927.LAA18439@racerx.synopsys.com > < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at > >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i >In-Reply-To: < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100 > >On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Joe Buck wrote: >>> I need to have GNATS write access. Mark Mitchell pointed me to >>> "overseers". Can someone set this up? >> >>Folks, I'll take care of it. >> >>A general question: Do new GCC contributors now automatically get a >>GNATS account set up from the beginning? >> >>If so, we don't need to document the procedure how to obtain one on >>the web, else we should (and I'm going to do so). >> >>In this case, can I mention the overseers address there? If so, can >>we have an alias overseers@gcc.gnu.org, please? (Trust me, this will >>save a couple of us some undesirable discussions later on... :-/) > >Won't this just work now? > >I guess we'll find out. This email is sent to "overseers@gcc.gnu.org". > >cgf