Re: failure notice

[Chris Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

Well, *now* it certainly works...

cgf

On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:30:43PM -0000, MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com wrote:
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
><overseers@gcc.gnu.org>:
>/  Mail note rejected:  List address must be in To: or Cc: headers.
>
>
>--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
>Return-Path: <cgf@redhat.com>
>Received: (qmail 28970 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000
>Received: from runyon.cygnus.com (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
>  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000
>Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (loony.cygnus.com [205.180.230.181])
>	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25910
>	for <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:30:41 -0800 (PST)
>Received: (from cgf@localhost)
>	by rtl.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id QAA19044
>	for overseers@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500
>Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500
>From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: GNATS write access
>Message-ID: <20001103163029.P17861@redhat.com>
>Reply-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
>Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
>References: < 200011031927.LAA18439@racerx.synopsys.com > < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
>In-Reply-To: < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100
>
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Joe Buck wrote:
>>> I need to have GNATS write access.  Mark Mitchell pointed me to
>>> "overseers".  Can someone set this up?
>>
>>Folks, I'll take care of it.
>>
>>A general question: Do new GCC contributors now automatically get a
>>GNATS account set up from the beginning?
>>
>>If so, we don't need to document the procedure how to obtain one on
>>the web, else we should (and I'm going to do so).
>>
>>In this case, can I mention the overseers address there? If so, can
>>we have an alias overseers@gcc.gnu.org, please? (Trust me, this will
>>save a couple of us some undesirable discussions later on... :-/)
>
>Won't this just work now?
>
>I guess we'll find out.  This email is sent to "overseers@gcc.gnu.org".
>
>cgf