* libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com
@ 2001-12-31 19:40 Joseph S. Myers
2001-01-01 11:49 ` Joseph S. Myers
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 38+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
This problem has been reported before, a month ago
<URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2000-q4/msg00309.html >.
The libstdc++ mailing list is supposed to be a gcc.gnu.org mailing list.
While the list archives now correctly reflect this, subscription messages
still contain references to the wrong hostnames.
Subject: confirm subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread* libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-01 11:49 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-01 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: overseers This problem has been reported before, a month ago <URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2000-q4/msg00309.html >. The libstdc++ mailing list is supposed to be a gcc.gnu.org mailing list. While the list archives now correctly reflect this, subscription messages still contain references to the wrong hostnames. Subject: confirm subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-01 11:49 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-01-01 12:16 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2 siblings, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: overseers On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The libstdc++ mailing list is supposed to be a gcc.gnu.org mailing list. > While the list archives now correctly reflect this, subscription messages > still contain references to the wrong hostnames. Just to becompletely sure: When it comes to Web and FTP, all sources->gcc issues have been fixed now? :-) Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-01-01 12:16 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-01-01 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: overseers On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The libstdc++ mailing list is supposed to be a gcc.gnu.org mailing list. > While the list archives now correctly reflect this, subscription messages > still contain references to the wrong hostnames. Just to becompletely sure: When it comes to Web and FTP, all sources->gcc issues have been fixed now? :-) Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-01-01 12:16 ` Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:09 ` Joseph S. Myers ` (2 more replies) 1 sibling, 3 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: overseers On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Just to becompletely sure: When it comes to Web and FTP, all > sources->gcc issues have been fixed now? :-) libstdc++/download.html still refers to the sources.redhat.com mirror list. To fix this, the libstdc++ files need to move physically under /pub/gcc (either with a symlink libstdc++ -> gcc/libstdc++, or merging with GCC's old-releases and mail-archives). Perhaps, with libstdc++-v3 in GCC 3.0, there will be no point in having a separate FTP site or separately installable libstdc++ tarballs, and the route of moving all tarballs into /pub/gcc/old-releases can be followed? -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 11:09 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Phil Edwards 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: overseers On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Just to becompletely sure: When it comes to Web and FTP, all > sources->gcc issues have been fixed now? :-) libstdc++/download.html still refers to the sources.redhat.com mirror list. To fix this, the libstdc++ files need to move physically under /pub/gcc (either with a symlink libstdc++ -> gcc/libstdc++, or merging with GCC's old-releases and mail-archives). Perhaps, with libstdc++-v3 in GCC 3.0, there will be no point in having a separate FTP site or separately installable libstdc++ tarballs, and the route of moving all tarballs into /pub/gcc/old-releases can be followed? -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:09 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Phil Edwards 2001-01-03 11:20 ` Phil Edwards 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2 siblings, 1 reply; 38+ messages in thread From: Phil Edwards @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, overseers, bkoz On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:09:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > Just to becompletely sure: When it comes to Web and FTP, all > > sources->gcc issues have been fixed now? :-) > > libstdc++/download.html still refers to the sources.redhat.com mirror > list. To fix this, the libstdc++ files need to move physically under > /pub/gcc (either with a symlink libstdc++ -> gcc/libstdc++, or merging > with GCC's old-releases and mail-archives). > > Perhaps, with libstdc++-v3 in GCC 3.0, there will be no point in having a > separate FTP site or separately installable libstdc++ tarballs, and the > route of moving all tarballs into /pub/gcc/old-releases can be followed? I believe we would still like to create stable, tested, working library snapshots. I can't speak to the issue of which FTP site we'd be using, but there will still be library tarballs for a while. After 3.0 is actually released, we'll probably still be adding improvements and extensions. Phil -- pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Phil Edwards @ 2001-01-03 11:20 ` Phil Edwards 0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Phil Edwards @ 2001-01-03 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, overseers, bkoz On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:09:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > Just to becompletely sure: When it comes to Web and FTP, all > > sources->gcc issues have been fixed now? :-) > > libstdc++/download.html still refers to the sources.redhat.com mirror > list. To fix this, the libstdc++ files need to move physically under > /pub/gcc (either with a symlink libstdc++ -> gcc/libstdc++, or merging > with GCC's old-releases and mail-archives). > > Perhaps, with libstdc++-v3 in GCC 3.0, there will be no point in having a > separate FTP site or separately installable libstdc++ tarballs, and the > route of moving all tarballs into /pub/gcc/old-releases can be followed? I believe we would still like to create stable, tested, working library snapshots. I can't speak to the issue of which FTP site we'd be using, but there will still be library tarballs for a while. After 3.0 is actually released, we'll probably still be adding improvements and extensions. Phil -- pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:09 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Phil Edwards @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-01-03 11:18 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2 siblings, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, overseers > libstdc++/download.html still refers to the sources.redhat.com mirror > list. To fix this, the libstdc++ files need to move physically under > /pub/gcc (either with a symlink libstdc++ -> gcc/libstdc++, or merging > with GCC's old-releases and mail-archives). this stuff is still on sourceware because.... ...because that's where I have access to put stuff up for ftp. People seem to be confused about this: it seems likely that a libstdc++ directory on the main gcc server is the clearest solution for end-users. what I need are the contents of the pub/libstdc++ directory moved from sourceware over to the gcc ftp servers. > Perhaps, with libstdc++-v3 in GCC 3.0, there will be no point in having a > separate FTP site or separately installable libstdc++ tarballs, and the > route of moving all tarballs into /pub/gcc/old-releases can be followed? No. There will still be numbered releases for libstdc++, and I belive, libjava. We still need these directories, sorry if there was confusion. benjamin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-01-03 11:18 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-01-03 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer, overseers > libstdc++/download.html still refers to the sources.redhat.com mirror > list. To fix this, the libstdc++ files need to move physically under > /pub/gcc (either with a symlink libstdc++ -> gcc/libstdc++, or merging > with GCC's old-releases and mail-archives). this stuff is still on sourceware because.... ...because that's where I have access to put stuff up for ftp. People seem to be confused about this: it seems likely that a libstdc++ directory on the main gcc server is the clearest solution for end-users. what I need are the contents of the pub/libstdc++ directory moved from sourceware over to the gcc ftp servers. > Perhaps, with libstdc++-v3 in GCC 3.0, there will be no point in having a > separate FTP site or separately installable libstdc++ tarballs, and the > route of moving all tarballs into /pub/gcc/old-releases can be followed? No. There will still be numbered releases for libstdc++, and I belive, libjava. We still need these directories, sorry if there was confusion. benjamin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-01-03 11:18 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:21 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 1 sibling, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, Gerald Pfeifer, overseers In message < Pine.SOL.3.91.1010103111516.17185A-100000@cse.cygnus.com >you writ e: > ...because that's where I have access to put stuff up for ftp. People seem > to be confused about this: it seems likely that a libstdc++ directory on th > e main gcc server is the clearest solution for end-users. Actually you have permissions to get to both FTP areas :-) > what I need are the contents of the pub/libstdc++ directory moved > from sourceware over to the gcc ftp servers. That's easy enough :-) mv ~ftp/pub/libstdc++ ~ftp/pub/gcc/ Or something similar depending on exactly where in the GCC ftp tree you want the libstdc++-v3 bits to appear. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 12:21 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, Gerald Pfeifer, overseers In message < Pine.SOL.3.91.1010103111516.17185A-100000@cse.cygnus.com >you writ e: > ...because that's where I have access to put stuff up for ftp. People seem > to be confused about this: it seems likely that a libstdc++ directory on th > e main gcc server is the clearest solution for end-users. Actually you have permissions to get to both FTP areas :-) > what I need are the contents of the pub/libstdc++ directory moved > from sourceware over to the gcc ftp servers. That's easy enough :-) mv ~ftp/pub/libstdc++ ~ftp/pub/gcc/ Or something similar depending on exactly where in the GCC ftp tree you want the libstdc++-v3 bits to appear. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:21 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-01-03 12:37 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, Gerald Pfeifer, overseers > > ...because that's where I have access to put stuff up for ftp. People seem > > to be confused about this: it seems likely that a libstdc++ directory on th > > e main gcc server is the clearest solution for end-users. > Actually you have permissions to get to both FTP areas :-) Doh! Whoops. > > what I need are the contents of the pub/libstdc++ directory moved > > from sourceware over to the gcc ftp servers. > That's easy enough :-) > > mv ~ftp/pub/libstdc++ ~ftp/pub/gcc/ > > Or something similar depending on exactly where in the GCC ftp tree you > want the libstdc++-v3 bits to appear. Here's a sample mirror: ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/ ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/libstdc++/ I'm assuming that what we want as the final form is something like ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libstdc++/ ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libjava/ etc. I think this will work. As long as nobody objects, I'll do this today. I just looked around, and it looks like the gnu mirrors were hand-mirroring libstdc++-v3, plus sourceware mirrors. Oh well. Hopefully this will consolidate some of the duplicates. -benjamin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-01-03 12:37 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-01-03 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, Gerald Pfeifer, overseers > > ...because that's where I have access to put stuff up for ftp. People seem > > to be confused about this: it seems likely that a libstdc++ directory on th > > e main gcc server is the clearest solution for end-users. > Actually you have permissions to get to both FTP areas :-) Doh! Whoops. > > what I need are the contents of the pub/libstdc++ directory moved > > from sourceware over to the gcc ftp servers. > That's easy enough :-) > > mv ~ftp/pub/libstdc++ ~ftp/pub/gcc/ > > Or something similar depending on exactly where in the GCC ftp tree you > want the libstdc++-v3 bits to appear. Here's a sample mirror: ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/ ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/libstdc++/ I'm assuming that what we want as the final form is something like ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libstdc++/ ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libjava/ etc. I think this will work. As long as nobody objects, I'll do this today. I just looked around, and it looks like the gnu mirrors were hand-mirroring libstdc++-v3, plus sourceware mirrors. Oh well. Hopefully this will consolidate some of the duplicates. -benjamin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-01-03 12:37 ` Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda 2001-01-03 13:35 ` Jason Molenda 1 sibling, 1 reply; 38+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, Joseph S. Myers, Gerald Pfeifer, overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:36:59PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libstdc++/ > ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libjava/ > > etc. > > I think this will work. As long as nobody objects, I'll do this today. That'd hose the mailing list archiving if your lists are still being put in ~ftp/pub/libstdc++/mail-archives. The archivers assume that all lists are in ~ftp/pub/PROJECTNAME/mail-archives. The ~listarch/.qmail-libstdc++* files would need to be tweaked to make them similar to a gcc list and the existing -q1 archives in ~ftp/pub/libstdc+ would need to be moved into ~ftp/pub/gcc. J ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda @ 2001-01-03 13:35 ` Jason Molenda 0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jason Molenda @ 2001-01-03 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, Joseph S. Myers, Gerald Pfeifer, overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:36:59PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libstdc++/ > ftp://ftp.freesoftware.com/pub/sourceware/gcc/libjava/ > > etc. > > I think this will work. As long as nobody objects, I'll do this today. That'd hose the mailing list archiving if your lists are still being put in ~ftp/pub/libstdc++/mail-archives. The archivers assume that all lists are in ~ftp/pub/PROJECTNAME/mail-archives. The ~listarch/.qmail-libstdc++* files would need to be tweaked to make them similar to a gcc list and the existing -q1 archives in ~ftp/pub/libstdc+ would need to be moved into ~ftp/pub/gcc. J ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-01 11:49 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-01 12:03 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2 siblings, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: overseers On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 07:49:42PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >This problem has been reported before, a month ago ><URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2000-q4/msg00309.html >. > >The libstdc++ mailing list is supposed to be a gcc.gnu.org mailing list. >While the list archives now correctly reflect this, subscription messages >still contain references to the wrong hostnames. > > Subject: confirm subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com > > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list. I've changed all occurrences of 'sourceware.cygnus.com' to 'gcc.gnu.org' in the text that it sent by ezmlm but the subscription message still refers to sources.redhat.com: Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list. To confirm that you would like cgf@redhat.com added to the libstdc++ mailing list, please send an empty reply to this address: libstdc++-sc.978379137.dgbglojhcobfaklbhcnb-cgf=redhat.com@sources.redhat.com I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. I think that changing this would require some changes to qmail and/or ezmlm itself so this won't happen anytime soon. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-01 12:03 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-01 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: overseers On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 07:49:42PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >This problem has been reported before, a month ago ><URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2000-q4/msg00309.html >. > >The libstdc++ mailing list is supposed to be a gcc.gnu.org mailing list. >While the list archives now correctly reflect this, subscription messages >still contain references to the wrong hostnames. > > Subject: confirm subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com > > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > libstdc++@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list. I've changed all occurrences of 'sourceware.cygnus.com' to 'gcc.gnu.org' in the text that it sent by ezmlm but the subscription message still refers to sources.redhat.com: Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list. To confirm that you would like cgf@redhat.com added to the libstdc++ mailing list, please send an empty reply to this address: libstdc++-sc.978379137.dgbglojhcobfaklbhcnb-cgf=redhat.com@sources.redhat.com I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. I think that changing this would require some changes to qmail and/or ezmlm itself so this won't happen anytime soon. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-01 12:03 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:04 ` Joseph S. Myers ` (3 more replies) 1 sibling, 4 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use gcc.gnu.org throughout. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 11:04 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use gcc.gnu.org throughout. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:04 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 11:07 ` Christopher Faylor ` (2 more replies) 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 3 siblings, 3 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use >gcc.gnu.org throughout. Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. I would prefer that someone who was directly connected with the gcc project do that... cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-03 11:07 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-03 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use >gcc.gnu.org throughout. Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. I would prefer that someone who was directly connected with the gcc project do that... cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 11:07 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 21:34 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2 siblings, 1 reply; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, overseers In message < 20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com >you write: > Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from > sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. > > I would prefer that someone who was directly connected with the gcc > project do that... I took care of physically moving the lists tonight. Hopefully everything is still working :-) :-) jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 21:34 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, overseers In message < 20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com >you write: > Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from > sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. > > I would prefer that someone who was directly connected with the gcc > project do that... I took care of physically moving the lists tonight. Hopefully everything is still working :-) :-) jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 11:07 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 20:57 ` Jeffrey A Law 2 siblings, 1 reply; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, overseers In message < 20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com >you write: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > > > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use > >gcc.gnu.org throughout. > > Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from > sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. BTW, the physical location is pretty easy to change. The easiest way to do it without interrupting service is to mv the directory into the new location and leave a symlink temporarily in place. Then you go to /qmail/alias and update it's links to point to the new location. Then you go back and zap the old directory symlink. This avoids most problems with interruption of service. I'll try to take care physically moving the libstdc++ shortly. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 20:57 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Joseph S. Myers, overseers In message < 20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com >you write: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > > > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use > >gcc.gnu.org throughout. > > Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from > sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. BTW, the physical location is pretty easy to change. The easiest way to do it without interrupting service is to mv the directory into the new location and leave a symlink temporarily in place. Then you go to /qmail/alias and update it's links to point to the new location. Then you go back and zap the old directory symlink. This avoids most problems with interruption of service. I'll try to take care physically moving the libstdc++ shortly. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:04 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:26 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 3 siblings, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, overseers In message < Pine.SOL.4.21.0101031903090.10101-100000@green.csi.cam.ac.uk >you write: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > > No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use gcc.gnu.org > throughout. Can someone try the libstdc++ lists now? I think I've made the magic tweak to make them believe they're hosted by gcc.gnu.org. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 12:26 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, overseers In message < Pine.SOL.4.21.0101031903090.10101-100000@green.csi.cam.ac.uk >you write: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > > No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use gcc.gnu.org > throughout. Can someone try the libstdc++ lists now? I think I've made the magic tweak to make them believe they're hosted by gcc.gnu.org. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:26 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 12:34 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 1 sibling, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, overseers On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Can someone try the libstdc++ lists now? I think I've made the magic tweak > to make them believe they're hosted by gcc.gnu.org. A subscription attempt still yields a message with subject "confirm subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com". -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 12:34 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeffrey A Law; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, overseers On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Can someone try the libstdc++ lists now? I think I've made the magic tweak > to make them believe they're hosted by gcc.gnu.org. A subscription attempt still yields a message with subject "confirm subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com". -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 12:34 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 12:56 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:34:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jeffrey A Law wrote: >> Can someone try the libstdc++ lists now? I think I've made the magic tweak >> to make them believe they're hosted by gcc.gnu.org. > >A subscription attempt still yields a message with subject "confirm >subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com". Ok. I made a few more changes and it seems to correctly indicate "gcc.gnu.org" now when I subscribe. Can you verify this? cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-03 12:56 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-03 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:34:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jeffrey A Law wrote: >> Can someone try the libstdc++ lists now? I think I've made the magic tweak >> to make them believe they're hosted by gcc.gnu.org. > >A subscription attempt still yields a message with subject "confirm >subscribe to libstdc++@sources.redhat.com". Ok. I made a few more changes and it seems to correctly indicate "gcc.gnu.org" now when I subscribe. Can you verify this? cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 12:56 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 13:04 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 1 sibling, 2 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, overseers On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Ok. I made a few more changes and it seems to correctly indicate > "gcc.gnu.org" now when I subscribe. > > Can you verify this? libstdc++ seems OK, similar changes seem to be needed for the libstdc++-cvs list as well. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 13:04 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 1 sibling, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-01-03 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, overseers On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Ok. I made a few more changes and it seems to correctly indicate > "gcc.gnu.org" now when I subscribe. > > Can you verify this? libstdc++ seems OK, similar changes seem to be needed for the libstdc++-cvs list as well. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 13:04 ` Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 14:06 ` Christopher Faylor 1 sibling, 1 reply; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:03:57PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Ok. I made a few more changes and it seems to correctly indicate >>"gcc.gnu.org" now when I subscribe. >> >>Can you verify this? > >libstdc++ seems OK, similar changes seem to be needed for the >libstdc++-cvs list as well. Ok. I've done this. I didn't realize it was quite this simple or I would have done it before. I changed everything that I could find with the name 'libstdc++' in it. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-03 14:06 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2001-01-03 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Jeffrey A Law, overseers On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:03:57PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Ok. I made a few more changes and it seems to correctly indicate >>"gcc.gnu.org" now when I subscribe. >> >>Can you verify this? > >libstdc++ seems OK, similar changes seem to be needed for the >libstdc++-cvs list as well. Ok. I've done this. I didn't realize it was quite this simple or I would have done it before. I changed everything that I could find with the name 'libstdc++' in it. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:24 ` Jeffrey A Law 3 siblings, 1 reply; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-12-31 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, overseers In message < Pine.SOL.4.21.0101031903090.10101-100000@green.csi.cam.ac.uk >you write: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > > No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use gcc.gnu.org > throughout. There's a magic bit that allows a list to be virtually hosted on either sources.redhat.com or gcc.gnu.org. What we need to do is find that magic config stuff and twiddle it appropriately. I believe we just need to twiddle <listname>/config and replace sourceware.cygnus.com with gcc.gnu.org jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 12:24 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 0 replies; 38+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2001-01-03 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Christopher Faylor, overseers In message < Pine.SOL.4.21.0101031903090.10101-100000@green.csi.cam.ac.uk >you write: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > > No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use gcc.gnu.org > throughout. There's a magic bit that allows a list to be virtually hosted on either sources.redhat.com or gcc.gnu.org. What we need to do is find that magic config stuff and twiddle it appropriately. I believe we just need to twiddle <listname>/config and replace sourceware.cygnus.com with gcc.gnu.org jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 38+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-31 19:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-12-31 19:40 libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-01 11:49 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-01-01 12:16 ` Gerald Pfeifer 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:09 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Phil Edwards 2001-01-03 11:20 ` Phil Edwards 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-01-03 11:18 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:21 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-01-03 12:37 ` Benjamin Kosnik 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jason Molenda 2001-01-03 13:35 ` Jason Molenda 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-01 12:03 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 11:04 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 11:07 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 21:34 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 20:57 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:26 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 12:34 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 12:56 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-01-03 13:04 ` Joseph S. Myers 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-01-03 14:06 ` Christopher Faylor 2001-12-31 19:40 ` Jeffrey A Law 2001-01-03 12:24 ` Jeffrey A Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).