From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 19:40:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com> References: <20010101150311.A9843@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001/msg00010.html On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use >gcc.gnu.org throughout. Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. I would prefer that someone who was directly connected with the gcc project do that... cgf From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Faylor To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 11:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com> References: <20010101150311.A9843@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00010.html Message-ID: <20010103110700.UkPaGx7iqGBnrH60wJukNug6U67lQA5K3R0RiFQjt3I@z> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though. > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use >gcc.gnu.org throughout. Ok. It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then. I would prefer that someone who was directly connected with the gcc project do that... cgf