From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>, overseers@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++ list still thinks it's at sources.redhat.com 
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 20:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <8991.978581867@upchuck>
References: <20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00027.html
Message-ID: <20010103205700.ypfEczvv11IW26Ll7dkB2ghQCQqczE7zyUNpmmbRiFA@z>

  In message < 20010103140748.B14748@redhat.com >you write:
  > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:04:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
  > >On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
  > >> I assume that all gcc.gnu.org lists are similar, though.
  > >
  > >No, the messages produced by gcc-subscribe (for example) use
  > >gcc.gnu.org throughout.
  > 
  > Ok.  It looks like the list really needs to be physically moved from
  > sourceware to the gcc ezmlm hierarchy, then.
BTW, the physical location is pretty easy to change.  The easiest
way to do it without interrupting service is to mv the directory into
the new location and leave a symlink temporarily in place.

Then you go to /qmail/alias and update it's links to point to the new
location.

Then you go back and zap the old directory symlink.

This avoids most problems with interruption of service.

I'll try to take care physically moving the libstdc++ shortly.

jeff